Provides decision framework for asking clarifying questions only on high-impact ambiguities versus proceeding autonomously on reversible, standard tasks to minimize interaction rounds.
From conservenpx claudepluginhub athola/claude-night-market --plugin conserveThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Designs and optimizes AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, observation formats, error recovery, and context for higher task completion rates.
Enables AI agents to execute x402 payments with per-task budgets, spending controls, and non-custodial wallets via MCP tools. Use when agents pay for APIs, services, or other agents.
Compares coding agents like Claude Code and Aider on custom YAML-defined codebase tasks using git worktrees, measuring pass rate, cost, time, and consistency.
Guidance on when to ask clarifying questions versus proceeding autonomously.
Ask questions only when ambiguity would materially impair correctness or capacity to fulfill the request precisely.
| Scenario | Why | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Destructive Operations | Irreversible, high cost of error | "Delete which files?" |
| Multiple Valid Approaches | Materially different tradeoffs | "Add index vs cache vs denormalize?" |
| Security-Critical | Wrong choice = vulnerability | "Which auth method?" |
| Data Migration | Data loss risk | "Preserve or transform?" |
| Breaking Changes | Affects downstream users | "Deprecate or remove?" |
Before asking, verify:
| Scenario | Why | Assumption |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Approach Exists | Industry convention | Use conventional pattern |
| Easily Reversible | Low cost of error | Can undo via git/backup |
| Clear from Context | Intent is obvious | Proceed with stated goal |
| User Can Review | PR/dry-run available | Changes are inspectable |
Proceed without asking if:
| Reversibility | Ambiguity | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Reversible | Low | Proceed |
| Reversible | High | Proceed with preview |
| Irreversible | Low | Proceed with confirmation |
| Irreversible | High | Ask |
Always ensure rollback is possible:
git stash, backup branchesUser: "Delete the old files"
Analysis:
Response:
Which files should I delete? I found:
- Files unchanged >6 months: 23 files
- Files in deprecated/: 5 files
- Files marked TODO remove: 2 files
User: "Add error handling to the parser"
Analysis:
Action: Implement try/catch with logging, create PR.
User: "Refactor the API layer"
Analysis:
Action:
Refactoring API layer. Proposed changes:
1. Extract authentication middleware
2. Standardize error responses
3. Add request validation
Creating branch: refactor/api-layer
Preview diff available before merge.
Combine with:
conserve:response-compression - Direct communicationsanctum:git-workspace-review - Context gatheringimbue:scope-guard - Scope management| Situation | Action |
|---|---|
| "Delete X" | Ask which X |
| "Add feature" | Proceed with standard approach |
| "Fix bug" | Proceed with obvious fix |
| "Choose between A/B" | Ask for preference |
| "Optimize query" | Ask if multiple approaches |
| "Format code" | Proceed with project style |
| "Deploy to prod" | Ask for confirmation |