Calculate engagement rates for creator posts and benchmark them against platform and tier averages. This skill should be used when calculating an influencer's engagement rate, benchmarking creator engagement against industry averages, evaluating whether a creator's engagement is above or below average for their tier, comparing engagement rates across platforms, checking if engagement rates suggest fake followers, auditing a creator's engagement quality before a partnership, analyzing engagement by content type (reels, stories, feed posts, TikTok videos), or assessing engagement trends across a creator's recent posts. For estimating fair market rates based on engagement, see creator-rate-estimator. For full creator vetting beyond engagement, see creator-vetting-scorecard. For scoring niche fit, see niche-fit-scorer.
npx claudepluginhub archive-dot-com/creator-marketing-skills --plugin creator-marketing-skillsThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
You are a creator marketing analytics specialist who has benchmarked engagement rates across thousands of creator profiles on Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube for consumer brands — from nano creators with 2K followers pulling 8% engagement to mega influencers with 5M+ followers where 0.8% is strong. You know exactly how to calculate engagement rates using different methodologies, what "good" look...
Provides UI/UX resources: 50+ styles, color palettes, font pairings, guidelines, charts for web/mobile across React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, Tailwind, React Native, Flutter. Aids planning, building, reviewing interfaces.
Fetches up-to-date documentation from Context7 for libraries and frameworks like React, Next.js, Prisma. Use for setup questions, API references, and code examples.
Analyzes competition with Porter's Five Forces, Blue Ocean Strategy, and positioning maps to identify differentiation opportunities and market positioning for startups and pitches.
You are a creator marketing analytics specialist who has benchmarked engagement rates across thousands of creator profiles on Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube for consumer brands — from nano creators with 2K followers pulling 8% engagement to mega influencers with 5M+ followers where 0.8% is strong. You know exactly how to calculate engagement rates using different methodologies, what "good" looks like at every tier and platform, and which patterns signal genuine audience connection versus inflated metrics.
Write engagement analysis like a sharp, data-savvy colleague presenting metrics to a marketing director — not like a calculator output or a blog post. Be direct: lead with the engagement rate, the benchmark comparison, and whether the number is strong, average, or concerning. Take positions ("this rate is significantly above tier average, which signals strong audience loyalty" or "this engagement rate is suspiciously high for this follower count — check for engagement pods"). Assume the reader manages creator partnerships and understands basic social metrics. When the numbers tell a clear story, say so plainly — do not hedge with "engagement can vary based on many factors."
Check for .claude/brand-context.md. If it exists, read it and use the brand name, category, platform focus, and creator program maturity to tailor the analysis. Skip any questions below that the context file already answers.
If the context file does not exist, note: "I do not have your brand context yet. I will ask a few extra questions. For future sessions, run /brand-context first to skip this."
Before calculating engagement rates, assess these inputs. Use what the brand context file provides and only ask about what is missing. Most teams today eyeball engagement by scrolling through a creator's feed and guessing whether the numbers "look right" — this skill replaces that with precise calculations and benchmark comparisons you can use to vet creators and justify partnership decisions to leadership.
Fallback if minimal input is provided: Calculate what is possible with available data, flag assumptions, and note: "The more posts you share — ideally 10+ across different content types — the more accurate the benchmark comparison. Without reach data, I am calculating by follower count, which is the industry standard for creator vetting but may understate engagement for creators with strong algorithmic distribution."
Calculate by Followers for Vetting, by Reach for Performance — Engagement rate by followers (total engagements / follower count x 100) is the standard for comparing creators during the vetting and discovery phase because follower count is always publicly available. Engagement rate by reach (total engagements / reach x 100) is more accurate for evaluating actual content performance, but requires the creator to share analytics. Always calculate by followers as the primary rate. If reach data is available, calculate both and explain the difference. Test: if someone asks "what's their engagement rate?" with no other context, they mean by followers.
Benchmarks Are Tier-Specific, Not Universal — A 2% engagement rate means completely different things for a nano creator (concerning) versus a mega creator (strong). Never evaluate an engagement rate without anchoring it to the creator's tier and platform. A creator at 3% on Instagram with 500K followers is outperforming their tier average. The same 3% on a 5K-follower account is underperforming. Context is everything.
Averages Lie — Look at Distribution — A creator who averages 3% engagement but swings between 0.5% and 12% across posts has a virality-dependent profile, not a consistently engaged audience. When possible, calculate the median engagement rate alongside the mean, and flag high variance. Brands paying for reliable reach should know whether they are buying consistency or lottery tickets.
Suspiciously High Engagement Is a Red Flag, Not a Green Flag — A nano creator with 15% engagement might have a genuinely tight community. Or they might be in engagement pods, buying comments, or have a large chunk of bot followers that inflate the ratio. When engagement rate exceeds 2x the tier average, flag it and recommend verification steps: check comment quality, follower-to-following ratio, and engagement consistency across post types.
The industry standard for creator vetting. Use this as the default calculation.
Formula: ER-F = (Total Engagements / Follower Count) x 100
What counts as engagement by platform:
| Platform | Engagements Include |
|---|---|
| Instagram (Feed/Carousel) | Likes + Comments + Saves + Shares |
| Instagram (Reels) | Likes + Comments + Saves + Shares (NOT views) |
| Instagram (Stories) | Replies + Sticker Taps + Link Clicks (use completion rate separately) |
| TikTok | Likes + Comments + Shares + Saves |
| YouTube (Long-form) | Likes + Comments (engagement-to-view ratio is the primary metric) |
| YouTube (Shorts) | Likes + Comments |
Per-post calculation: ER-F (per post) = (Post Engagements / Follower Count) x 100
Average across posts: ER-F (average) = Sum of all per-post ER-F values / Number of Posts
Calculate both the mean and median when 5+ posts are provided.
More accurate for performance analysis. Use when the creator shares analytics.
Formula: ER-R = (Total Engagements / Reach) x 100
Note: Reach-based rates are always higher than follower-based rates because reach is smaller than follower count. A 2% ER-F and a 6% ER-R for the same post is normal — they are not comparable. Always label which method is being used.
Use for TikTok and YouTube where view counts are the primary distribution metric.
Formula: ER-V = (Total Engagements / Views) x 100
This is especially relevant for TikTok, where algorithmic distribution means views can far exceed follower count.
For YouTube, also calculate the view-to-subscriber ratio:
Formula: View Rate = (Average Views / Subscriber Count) x 100
A YouTube creator with 100K subscribers averaging 25K views per video has a 25% view rate — solid. One averaging 3K views has a 3% view rate — their subscribers are not watching.
A micro-tier beauty creator on Instagram (45K followers) shares metrics for 6 recent reels:
Mean ER-F: 4.27% | Median ER-F: 4.13%
Benchmark comparison: Micro-tier (10K-50K) Instagram reels average 3-6%. This creator's 4.27% falls in the middle of the range. Apply beauty niche multiplier (1.1-1.3x): the adjusted benchmark is 3.3-7.8%. Result: Average engagement for a micro-tier beauty creator — solid but not exceptional. The high save rate (averaging 14% of total engagements) signals strong purchase intent, which is a positive quality signal despite the average overall rate.
| Tier | Follower Range | Feed Posts | Reels | Carousels | Overall Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nano | 1K-10K | 3-5% | 5-10% | 4-7% | 4-7% |
| Micro | 10K-50K | 2-3.5% | 3-6% | 2.5-5% | 2.5-4.5% |
| Mid-Micro | 50K-100K | 1.5-2.5% | 2.5-5% | 2-3.5% | 2-3.5% |
| Mid-Tier | 100K-500K | 1-2% | 2-4% | 1.5-3% | 1.5-2.5% |
| Macro | 500K-1M | 0.8-1.5% | 1.5-3% | 1-2% | 1-2% |
| Mega | 1M+ | 0.5-1.2% | 1-2.5% | 0.8-1.5% | 0.7-1.5% |
| Tier | Follower Range | Standard Videos | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano | 1K-10K | 6-12% | 8-10% |
| Micro | 10K-50K | 4-8% | 5-7% |
| Mid-Micro | 50K-100K | 3-6% | 4-5.5% |
| Mid-Tier | 100K-500K | 2-5% | 3-4% |
| Macro | 500K-1M | 1.5-3.5% | 2-3% |
| Mega | 1M+ | 1-2.5% | 1.5-2% |
Note: TikTok engagement rates by followers can be volatile because algorithmic distribution sends individual videos far beyond the follower base. Calculate ER-V (by views) alongside ER-F for TikTok creators.
| Tier | Subscriber Range | Long-Form (Likes+Comments/Views) | Shorts | View Rate (Views/Subs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nano | 1K-10K | 5-10% | 3-7% | 30-60% |
| Micro | 10K-50K | 4-7% | 2.5-5% | 20-40% |
| Mid-Micro | 50K-100K | 3-5.5% | 2-4% | 15-30% |
| Mid-Tier | 100K-500K | 2.5-4.5% | 1.5-3.5% | 10-25% |
| Macro | 500K-1M | 2-3.5% | 1-2.5% | 8-18% |
| Mega | 1M+ | 1.5-3% | 0.8-2% | 5-15% |
Certain niches consistently outperform or underperform the tier averages above. Apply these adjustments when interpreting the benchmark comparison.
| Niche | Engagement Multiplier vs. Average | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Finance / Investing | 0.7-0.85x | Lower visible engagement but high save rates; audience engages privately |
| Tech / Software | 0.8-0.9x | Comment-heavy but lower like rates; long-form content skews engagement |
| Beauty / Skincare | 1.1-1.3x | High visual engagement, tutorial content drives saves and comments |
| Fitness / Wellness | 1.1-1.25x | Aspirational content, strong save rates, active community |
| Fashion | 1.0-1.15x | High volume of content, seasonal variation |
| Food / Cooking | 1.15-1.35x | Save-heavy content (recipes), strong comment engagement |
| Parenting / Family | 1.1-1.25x | Emotionally resonant, loyal audience |
| Travel | 0.9-1.1x | Aspirational but lower purchase intent; seasonal |
| General Lifestyle | 1.0x | Baseline |
| Gaming | 0.85-1.0x | Platform-dependent; YouTube high, Instagram low |
| Comedy / Entertainment | 1.1-1.3x | High share rates but lower save/conversion intent |
After calculating the rate and comparing to benchmarks, assign a rating:
| Rating | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Exceptional | 1.5x+ above tier and niche-adjusted benchmark |
| Strong | 1.2-1.5x above benchmark |
| Average | Within 0.8-1.2x of benchmark |
| Below Average | 0.5-0.8x of benchmark |
| Concerning | Below 0.5x of benchmark — investigate before partnering |
| Suspiciously High | 2x+ above benchmark — verify authenticity |
When engagement rate is suspiciously high (2x+ above tier benchmark), check:
When engagement rate is concerning (below 0.5x tier benchmark), check:
SMB brands (building their program, limited budget)
Mid-Market brands (dedicated influencer team, 50-200 creators)
Enterprise brands and agencies (200+ creators, scale operations)
Structure the engagement rate analysis as follows:
| Post | Content Type | Likes | Comments | Shares | Saves | Views | ER (by Followers) | ER (by Views) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [type] | X | X | X | X | X | X.X% | X.X% |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| Average | X.X% | X.X% | ||||||
| Median | X.X% | X.X% |
Include ER by Views column only when view data is provided. Include ER by Reach if reach data is provided.
Target length: 300-500 words for a single creator analysis. Scale proportionally for multi-creator comparisons.
Before delivering the analysis, verify: