From aradotso-trending-skills-37
Provides prompt templates for building AI coding agents: system prompts, tool prompts, agent delegation, memory management, and multi-agent coordination patterns.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/aradotso-trending-skills-37:claude-code-promptsThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
```markdown
---
name: claude-code-prompts
description: Independently authored prompt templates for AI coding agents — system prompts, tool prompts, agent delegation, memory management, and multi-agent coordination patterns informed by studying Claude Code.
triggers:
- help me build a coding agent prompt
- set up a system prompt for my AI agent
- how do I structure tool prompts for an agent
- create a multi-agent coordination prompt
- write a memory management prompt for my agent
- I need a subagent delegation prompt
- how should I design agent safety rules
- help me implement Claude Code prompt patterns
---
# Claude Code Prompts
> Skill by [ara.so](https://ara.so) — Daily 2026 Skills collection.
A collection of independently authored prompt templates for building production AI coding agents. Covers system prompts, tool prompts, agent delegation, memory management, and multi-agent coordination — all patterns informed by studying how Claude Code behaves in practice.
---
## What This Project Provides
| Category | Count | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| System prompt | 1 | Agent identity, safety rules, tool routing, output format |
| Tool prompts | 11 | Shell, file read/edit/write, grep, glob, web search/fetch, agent launcher, ask user, plan mode |
| Agent prompts | 5 | General purpose, code explorer, solution architect, verification specialist, documentation guide |
| Memory prompts | 4 | Conversation summarization, session notes, memory extraction, memory consolidation |
| Coordinator prompt | 1 | Multi-worker orchestration with synthesis, delegation, and verification |
| Utility prompts | 4 | Session titles, tool summaries, away recaps, next-action suggestions |
| Pattern analyses | 9 | Commentary on each pattern with reusable templates |
| Cursor skills | 3 | Drop-in skills for coding standards, verification, and prompt design |
---
## Installation
```bash
git clone https://github.com/repowise-dev/claude-code-prompts.git
cd claude-code-prompts
For Cursor IDE skills, copy the skills directory to your Cursor skills folder:
cp -r skills/* ~/.cursor/skills-cursor/
No package install required — all content is Markdown prompt templates you copy and adapt.
claude-code-prompts/
├── complete-prompts/
│ ├── system-prompt.md # Main agent identity + behavioral rules
│ ├── coordinator-prompt.md # Multi-agent orchestration mode
│ ├── tool-prompts/
│ │ ├── shell-execution.md
│ │ ├── file-read.md
│ │ ├── file-edit.md
│ │ ├── file-write.md
│ │ ├── search-grep.md
│ │ ├── search-glob.md
│ │ ├── web-search.md
│ │ ├── web-fetch.md
│ │ ├── task-management.md # Agent launcher
│ │ ├── ask-user.md
│ │ └── plan-mode.md
│ ├── agent-prompts/
│ │ ├── general-purpose.md
│ │ ├── code-explorer.md
│ │ ├── solution-architect.md
│ │ ├── verification-specialist.md
│ │ └── documentation-guide.md
│ ├── memory-prompts/
│ │ ├── conversation-summary.md
│ │ ├── session-notes.md
│ │ ├── memory-extraction.md
│ │ └── memory-consolidation.md
│ └── utility-prompts/
│ ├── session-title.md
│ ├── tool-summary.md
│ ├── away-recap.md
│ └── next-action-suggestion.md
├── patterns/
│ ├── 01-system-prompt-architecture.md
│ ├── 02-core-behavioral-rules.md
│ ├── 03-safety-and-risk-assessment.md
│ ├── 04-tool-specific-instructions.md
│ ├── 05-agent-delegation.md
│ ├── 06-verification-and-testing.md
│ ├── 07-memory-and-context.md
│ ├── 08-multi-agent-coordination.md
│ └── 09-auxiliary-prompts.md
└── skills/
├── coding-agent-standards/SKILL.md
├── verification-agent/SKILL.md
└── prompt-architect/SKILL.md
The system prompt is layered in a specific order that matters:
1. Identity — who the agent is, what it's authorized to do
2. Permissions — what is in/out of scope
3. Behavioral rules — anti-patterns to avoid (over-engineering, unnecessary changes)
4. Safety rules — reversibility tiers, destructive action gates
5. Tool routing — which tool to use when
6. Code style — language-specific defaults
7. Output format — prose vs. code, verbosity, response length
Template structure from complete-prompts/system-prompt.md:
## Identity
You are {{AGENT_NAME}}, an AI coding agent operating inside {{ENVIRONMENT}}.
Your job is to {{PRIMARY_TASK}} while following the rules below exactly.
## Permissions
You MAY:
- Read and modify files within {{WORKING_DIRECTORY}}
- Execute shell commands in the project sandbox
- Spawn subagents for parallelizable subtasks
You MAY NOT:
- Modify files outside {{WORKING_DIRECTORY}} without explicit confirmation
- Execute destructive commands (rm -rf, DROP TABLE, etc.) without user approval
- Push to protected branches without confirmation
## Behavioral Rules
- Make the minimal change that solves the task. Do not refactor unless asked.
- Do not add dependencies without asking first.
- Do not introduce abstractions not required by the task.
- Prefer editing existing files over creating new ones.
## Safety Rules
### Reversibility Tiers
- SAFE: reading files, running tests, grepping, globbing
- CAUTION: editing files (always show diff before applying)
- DESTRUCTIVE: deleting files, dropping databases, force-pushing — always confirm
## Tool Routing
- Use shell for: running tests, git commands, installing packages
- Use file-read for: inspecting source code, configs, logs
- Use file-edit for: modifying existing files (never overwrite with file-write)
- Use search-grep for: finding symbol definitions, usage patterns
- Use web-search for: looking up docs, error messages, package versions
## Output Format
- Be concise. No filler phrases.
- Show code in fenced blocks with language tags.
- When explaining changes, use bullet points not prose paragraphs.
- Never truncate code with "... rest unchanged". Show complete blocks.
From patterns/03-safety-and-risk-assessment.md — the three-tier reversibility model:
## Risk Assessment Rules
Before executing any action, classify it:
### Tier 1 — Safe (no confirmation needed)
- Reading files, directories, environment
- Running read-only queries
- Running test suites
- Grepping, globbing, searching
### Tier 2 — Caution (show diff, proceed unless rejected)
- Editing source files
- Installing/removing packages
- Creating new files
- Modifying config files
### Tier 3 — Destructive (STOP, confirm explicitly)
- Deleting files or directories
- Dropping database tables or indexes
- Force-pushing to any branch
- Truncating data
- Any action that cannot be undone in under 60 seconds
When you reach a Tier 3 action, stop and output:
⚠️ DESTRUCTIVE ACTION REQUIRED
Action: [exact command or change]
Effect: [what will be lost or broken]
Confirm? (yes/no)
Do not proceed until the user types "yes".
Each tool gets its own prompt section. Example from complete-prompts/tool-prompts/file-edit.md:
## File Edit Tool
**Purpose:** Modify an existing file using exact string replacement.
**Rules:**
- You MUST read the file with file-read before editing.
- The `old_string` parameter must match the file exactly, character for character.
- Make `old_string` long enough to be unique in the file — include surrounding lines if needed.
- Never use file-write on an existing file. Always use file-edit.
- After editing, re-read the changed section to verify the result.
**Format:**
```tool
file_edit(
path="{{RELATIVE_FILE_PATH}}",
old_string="{{EXACT_EXISTING_CONTENT}}",
new_string="{{REPLACEMENT_CONTENT}}"
)
Common failure: old_string not unique → add more context lines above/below the target.
### 4. Agent Delegation
From `complete-prompts/tool-prompts/task-management.md` — when to spawn a subagent:
```markdown
## Agent Launcher Tool
**Spawn a subagent when:**
- The task is fully parallelizable (e.g., run tests AND generate docs simultaneously)
- The task requires a different permission scope than the current agent
- Adversarial verification is needed (spawn a separate agent to try to break the solution)
- The task is long-running and isolated (codebase exploration, documentation generation)
**Do NOT spawn a subagent when:**
- The task is sequential and depends on prior results
- The task takes fewer than 3 tool calls
- You are already inside a subagent
**Delegation format:**
```tool
launch_agent(
prompt="{{COMPLETE_SELF_CONTAINED_TASK_DESCRIPTION}}",
tools=["{{TOOL_1}}", "{{TOOL_2}}"],
context="{{RELEVANT_FILES_OR_STATE}}"
)
Critical: The subagent prompt must be fully self-contained. The subagent has no access to your conversation history. Include all relevant context inline.
### 5. Memory Management
From `complete-prompts/memory-prompts/conversation-summary.md`:
```markdown
## Conversation Summary Prompt
**Trigger:** When the context window exceeds {{CONTEXT_THRESHOLD}} tokens or the session exceeds {{MAX_TURNS}} turns.
**Output format (9 sections, no tools allowed during summarization):**
1. **Task** — original user request in one sentence
2. **Progress** — what has been completed, in order
3. **Current state** — exact files modified, current branch, last command run
4. **Pending** — remaining steps not yet started
5. **Blockers** — unresolved errors, waiting on user input, missing info
6. **Decisions made** — key architectural or implementation choices
7. **Rejected approaches** — what was tried and discarded, and why
8. **Open questions** — things the agent is uncertain about
9. **Next action** — the single next tool call to resume work
**Constraints:**
- No tool calls during summarization
- Output must fit in {{SUMMARY_MAX_TOKENS}} tokens
- Preserve exact file paths, function names, error messages — do not paraphrase these
From complete-prompts/coordinator-prompt.md:
## Coordinator Agent
You are the coordinator. You do not implement solutions directly.
Your job is to decompose tasks, delegate to worker agents, and synthesize results.
### Workflow
1. **Decompose** — break the task into independent subtasks
2. **Delegate** — launch one worker per subtask with a complete, self-contained prompt
3. **Monitor** — collect worker outputs
4. **Verify** — launch a verification specialist agent to adversarially test the solution
5. **Synthesize** — merge worker outputs, resolve conflicts, produce final result
### Worker Prompt Template
Each worker receives:
- Their specific subtask (one clear deliverable)
- All context they need (files, constraints, existing code)
- Their output format (what to return to coordinator)
- Their tool allowlist (only what they need)
### Verification Step
After workers complete, always launch a verification specialist:
```tool
launch_agent(
prompt="Adversarially test this solution: {{SOLUTION_SUMMARY}}. Try to find: logic errors, edge cases, security issues, performance problems. Return PASS, FAIL, or PARTIAL with findings.",
tools=["file-read", "shell-execution"],
context="{{SOLUTION_FILES}}"
)
---
## Verification Specialist Agent
The verification agent uses adversarial testing. From `complete-prompts/agent-prompts/verification-specialist.md`:
```markdown
## Verification Specialist
Your job is to find problems, not confirm success.
### Approach
1. Read the solution without assuming it is correct
2. Identify all possible failure modes:
- Edge cases (empty input, null, overflow, unicode)
- Race conditions (if async or concurrent)
- Security issues (injection, path traversal, secret leakage)
- Performance issues (O(n²) where O(n) expected, unbounded loops)
- Integration issues (does it break existing tests?)
3. Run the test suite. If tests pass, write additional tests for the cases above.
4. Never rationalize away a failure. If something looks wrong, report it.
### Output Format
**Verdict:** PASS | FAIL | PARTIAL
**Findings:**
- [CRITICAL] {{description}} — {{file}}:{{line}}
- [WARNING] {{description}} — {{file}}:{{line}}
- [INFO] {{description}}
**Test results:** {{passed}}/{{total}} tests passing
**Recommendation:** {{one sentence on whether to ship or fix first}}
The skills/ directory contains three drop-in Cursor skills:
# Copy all skills to Cursor's skill directory
cp -r skills/coding-agent-standards ~/.cursor/skills-cursor/
cp -r skills/verification-agent ~/.cursor/skills-cursor/
cp -r skills/prompt-architect ~/.cursor/skills-cursor/
skills/coding-agent-standards/SKILL.md)Sets behavioral defaults for any coding agent:
skills/verification-agent/SKILL.md)Adversarial verification workflow with strategies in strategies.md:
skills/prompt-architect/SKILL.md)Prompt design methodology with reference in reference.md:
{{UPPERCASE}})All templates use {{UPPERCASE_PLACEHOLDER}} syntax. Replace before use:
# Example replacements for a Python FastAPI agent
{{AGENT_NAME}} → FastAPI Dev Agent
{{ENVIRONMENT}} → VS Code with Python 3.12
{{WORKING_DIRECTORY}} → /workspace/myproject
{{PRIMARY_TASK}} → implement and test FastAPI endpoints
{{CONTEXT_THRESHOLD}} → 80000
{{MAX_TURNS}} → 50
{{SUMMARY_MAX_TOKENS}} → 2000
Automate substitution in your agent setup script:
import re
from pathlib import Path
def load_prompt(template_path: str, replacements: dict[str, str]) -> str:
template = Path(template_path).read_text()
for key, value in replacements.items():
template = template.replace(f"{{{{{key}}}}}", value)
# Warn on any unreplaced placeholders
remaining = re.findall(r"\{\{[A-Z_]+\}\}", template)
if remaining:
print(f"Warning: unreplaced placeholders: {remaining}")
return template
# Usage
system_prompt = load_prompt(
"complete-prompts/system-prompt.md",
{
"AGENT_NAME": "FastAPI Dev Agent",
"ENVIRONMENT": "VS Code",
"WORKING_DIRECTORY": "/workspace/myproject",
"PRIMARY_TASK": "implement and test FastAPI endpoints",
}
)
import anthropic
from pathlib import Path
client = anthropic.Anthropic() # uses ANTHROPIC_API_KEY env var
system_prompt = Path("complete-prompts/system-prompt.md").read_text()
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-opus-4-5",
max_tokens=8096,
system=system_prompt,
messages=[
{"role": "user", "content": "Add input validation to the /users endpoint"}
]
)
print(response.content[0].text)
import anthropic
from pathlib import Path
client = anthropic.Anthropic()
system_prompt = Path("complete-prompts/system-prompt.md").read_text()
# Append tool-specific prompts to system prompt
tool_prompts = [
Path("complete-prompts/tool-prompts/shell-execution.md").read_text(),
Path("complete-prompts/tool-prompts/file-edit.md").read_text(),
Path("complete-prompts/tool-prompts/search-grep.md").read_text(),
]
full_system = system_prompt + "\n\n" + "\n\n".join(tool_prompts)
tools = [
{
"name": "shell_execution",
"description": "Execute a shell command in the project sandbox",
"input_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"command": {"type": "string", "description": "The shell command to run"},
"cwd": {"type": "string", "description": "Working directory"}
},
"required": ["command"]
}
},
{
"name": "file_edit",
"description": "Edit an existing file using exact string replacement",
"input_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"path": {"type": "string"},
"old_string": {"type": "string"},
"new_string": {"type": "string"}
},
"required": ["path", "old_string", "new_string"]
}
}
]
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-opus-4-5",
max_tokens=8096,
system=full_system,
tools=tools,
messages=[
{"role": "user", "content": "Fix the failing test in test_users.py"}
]
)
import anthropic
from pathlib import Path
client = anthropic.Anthropic()
summary_prompt = Path("complete-prompts/memory-prompts/conversation-summary.md").read_text()
def compress_history(messages: list[dict], threshold: int = 40) -> list[dict]:
"""Compress conversation history when it exceeds threshold turns."""
if len(messages) < threshold:
return messages
# Ask the model to summarize the history so far
summary_response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-opus-4-5",
max_tokens=2000,
system=summary_prompt,
messages=messages
)
summary_text = summary_response.content[0].text
# Replace history with a single summary message
return [
{
"role": "user",
"content": f"[Session summary from earlier in this conversation]\n\n{summary_text}"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "Understood. I have the session context. Ready to continue."
}
]
# In your agent loop
messages = []
while True:
messages = compress_history(messages, threshold=40)
user_input = input("You: ")
messages.append({"role": "user", "content": user_input})
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-opus-4-5",
max_tokens=8096,
system=system_prompt,
messages=messages
)
assistant_message = response.content[0].text
messages.append({"role": "assistant", "content": assistant_message})
print(f"Agent: {assistant_message}")
| Pattern file | Key takeaway |
|---|---|
01-system-prompt-architecture.md | Layer order matters: identity → permissions → rules → tools → format |
02-core-behavioral-rules.md | Anti-over-engineering: minimal change, no unsolicited refactors |
03-safety-and-risk-assessment.md | Three reversibility tiers with hard gates on Tier 3 |
04-tool-specific-instructions.md | Each tool needs its own routing rules and failure modes documented |
05-agent-delegation.md | Subagent prompts must be fully self-contained — no shared history |
06-verification-and-testing.md | Adversarial verification: find failure modes, never rationalize them away |
07-memory-and-context.md | 9-section summary format preserves exact names/paths, drops filler |
08-multi-agent-coordination.md | Coordinator decomposes → delegates → verifies → synthesizes |
09-auxiliary-prompts.md | Utility prompts (titles, summaries, recaps) improve UX significantly |
## File Modification Policy
BEFORE editing any file:
1. Call file-read on the target file
2. Identify the exact string to replace (must be unique in the file)
3. Call file-edit with old_string and new_string
4. Call file-read again on the changed section to verify
NEVER call file-write on an existing file.
NEVER edit a file you have not read in this session.
## Clarification Policy
Ask for clarification ONLY when:
- The task is ambiguous in a way that would cause you to make a wrong architectural decision
- You are about to perform a Tier 3 (destructive) action
- You have been blocked by the same error more than twice
Do NOT ask for clarification when:
- You can make a reasonable assumption and state it
- The task is clear but large
- You need information you can find by reading the codebase
## Minimal Change Policy
- Solve the stated task. Do not solve adjacent tasks.
- Do not refactor code you are not asked to change.
- Do not add error handling beyond what the task requires.
- Do not introduce design patterns unless the task explicitly requires extensibility.
- Do not add comments explaining your changes — the code should be self-explanatory.
- If you notice a bug unrelated to the task, mention it in your response but do not fix it.
Run the load_prompt() helper above — it warns on any {{UPPERCASE}} patterns still present after substitution.
Tool routing instructions must appear in the system prompt, not the user message. Move them into your system= parameter.
Every subagent prompt must include all required context inline. The subagent has no access to the parent conversation. Use the delegation template from tool-prompts/task-management.md which includes a context= field.
Use the 9-section summary format from memory-prompts/conversation-summary.md. Sections 3 (current state) and 4 (pending) must preserve exact file paths, branch names, and command output — never paraphrase these.
Your verification prompt may be too permissive. Use the adversarial framing from agent-prompts/verification-specialist.md: the agent's job is to find problems, not confirm success. Add explicit instruction: "Never rationalize away a failure."
Skills must be in ~/.cursor/skills-cursor/ and each skill directory must contain a SKILL.md file. Restart Cursor after copying.
npx claudepluginhub aradotso/trending-skillsDocuments 30+ reconstructed prompt patterns for agentic AI coding assistants, covering system prompts, agent coordination, security classification, and memory hierarchies.
Creates Claude Code agents from scratch or by adapting templates. Guides requirements gathering, template selection, and file generation following Anthropic best practices (v2.1.63+).
Generates PhD-level expert-agent prompt files (.md) for Claude Code, creating definitive domain references with real code examples and detailed patterns.