From claude-code-config
Humanizes AI-generated English text for blog posts, articles, marketing copy by enhancing burstiness, perplexity, varying sentence patterns, transitions, and tone to evade AI detectors.
npx claudepluginhub anastasiyaw/claude-code-configThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
- Writing blog posts, articles, marketing copy in English
Removes AI-generated writing patterns from text and injects personality to sound natural and human-written. Use after drafting docs, emails, or copy.
Rewrites AI-generated text to sound naturally human-written by stripping robotic vocabulary, injecting burstiness and voice, and defeating AI detectors. Use for robotic, generic, or flagged content.
Applies research-backed principles to craft human-like prose avoiding AI tells. For articles, blog posts, emails, marketing copy, social media—not code or docs.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Specificity vs generality. Human text references exact things, takes positions, makes mistakes, shows personality. AI text covers all bases, hedges everything, uses the safest phrasings, produces text that could apply to any similar topic. "Surface polish with nothing underneath" is AI's signature.
AI writes flat, uniform sentences (15-25 words, clustered). Humans alternate wildly - a 5-word sentence next to a 40-word one.
Rules:
Before (low burstiness - AI-like):
AI retouching has become an important tool for photographers. It allows them to
enhance their images quickly and efficiently. Many professionals are now adopting
this technology in their workflow. The results are consistently impressive and
save considerable time.
After (high burstiness - human):
AI retouching changed everything. Not gradually - overnight. Photographers who
spent three hours on a single portrait now finish in seconds. The quality? Better
than most manual edits. Not all of them, sure. But enough that the 23 retouchers
I talked to last month all said the same thing: "I can't go back."
AI picks the most probable next word - consistently low perplexity, every word is the safest statistical choice. Human writing has perplexity spikes: unexpected metaphors, unusual word pairings, surprising verbs.
Rules:
Weak (predictable): "Many users find the tool helpful for their work." Strong (surprising): "84% of beta testers shipped their first edit in under 90 seconds."
Based on Liang et al. (arxiv 2406.07016) - 15M+ PubMed abstracts analysis. The 10 most effective marker words (highest excess ratio post-ChatGPT):
across, additionally, comprehensive, crucial, enhancing, exhibited, insights, notably, particularly, within
Other high-excess words (>5x frequency spike):
| Kill this | Replace with |
|---|---|
| delve (25.2x spike) | dig into, explore, look at |
| showcasing (9.2x) | showing, demo |
| underscores (9.1x) | highlights, shows |
| tapestry | mix, blend, combination |
| leverage | use, grab, tap into |
| utilize | use |
| enhance | boost, sharpen, improve |
| elevate | raise, lift, push |
| embark | start, kick off, jump into |
| resonate | click, land, hit home |
| landscape | space, market, field |
| multifaceted | complex, layered |
| intricate | detailed, complex |
| interplay | relationship, tension, push-pull |
| cutting-edge | latest, newest, bleeding-edge |
| game-changer | shift, breakthrough |
| revolutionize | reshape, rethink, flip |
| seamlessly | smoothly, without friction |
| illuminate | show, reveal, expose |
| unveil | launch, drop, release |
| remarkable | striking, sharp, wild |
Key finding from Liang et al.: unlike content shifts (COVID terms = nouns), LLM excess is almost entirely STYLE words - 66% verbs, 18% adjectives. This is what makes them detectable.
Note: "delve" showed 25.2x spike but dropped sharply in 2025 after being called out. LLMs and humans co-evolve - static word lists go stale. The principles matter more than specific words.
| Kill this | Replace with |
|---|---|
| In order to | To |
| Due to the fact that | Because |
| It is important to note | (delete entirely) |
| It is worth mentioning | (delete entirely) |
| At the end of the day | (delete entirely) |
| In today's world | (delete entirely) |
| As a matter of fact | Actually / In fact |
| For all intents and purposes | (delete entirely) |
| needless to say | (delete - if needless, don't say it) |
| a wide range of | many / various |
| in the realm of | in |
| Kill this | Replace with |
|---|---|
| Furthermore | And / Plus / On top of that |
| Moreover | And / What's more |
| Additionally | Also / And |
| In conclusion | (use "Conclusion" as H2, never "In conclusion") |
| To summarize | (just summarize, don't announce it) |
| It's worth noting | (delete - just note it) |
| That being said | But / Still / That said |
| On the other hand | But / Then again |
Never start 2+ consecutive sentences the same way.
Good openers to rotate:
| Formal (AI-like) | Natural (human) |
|---|---|
| it is | it's |
| you are | you're |
| do not | don't |
| cannot | can't |
| we have | we've |
| they will | they'll |
| here is | here's |
| that is | that's |
After writing, verify:
| Symptom | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Text "feels" AI | Low burstiness - all sentences same length | Chop some in half, merge others |
| Flagged by GPTZero | High predictability - obvious word choices | Replace 5-10 nouns with specific alternatives |
| Sounds like a textbook | Too formal, no contractions | Add contractions + 2 rhetorical questions |
| Repetitive paragraph starts | Same transition pattern | Rotate: statement → number → question → quote |
| Reads like a press release | No personality, no "I" or "you" | Add 1 personal observation + direct "you" address |
| Vague / generic | Abstraction over specificity | Replace every "many/some/various" with a number |
| Surface polish, nothing underneath | Generic frameworks, verbose padding | Cut 30% of text, add 3 concrete examples |
**Bold header**: explanation in every bullet. Vary: some bold, some not, some just text.