From ai-tooling
Activates relevant marketplace skills before every task. Ensures purpose-built workflows are used instead of improvised solutions.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/ai-tooling:acp-loaderThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
(Plugin id `acp-loader` kept for install compatibility.)
(Plugin id acp-loader kept for install compatibility.)
The loader that ensures every skill gets activated. Without this, skills sit idle while Claude improvises solutions that already have purpose-built workflows.
If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill entirely. If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill.IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
Marketplace skills override default system prompt behavior, but user instructions always take precedence:
If CLAUDE.md says "don't use TDD" and a skill says "always use TDD," follow the user's instructions. The user is in control.
Use the Skill tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you -- follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.
Skills are namespaced by plugin: plugin-name:skill-name (e.g., ai-tooling:agent-sdk-builder, python-development:python-tdd).
Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action. Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to follow it.
Before responding to ANY user message, run this check:
1. Is the user about to BUILD something new?
--> Settle requirements and design BEFORE code, then apply the domain skills below
2. Is the user asking to FIX a bug?
--> Investigate root cause before fixing (no blind patches)
3. Is this React or PWA work?
--> Check: react-development:react-best-practices, pwa-expert:pwa-development
4. Is this a code review request?
--> Check: senior-review:code-review, senior-review:full-review
5. Is this Python work?
--> Check: python-development skills (python-tdd, python-refactor, etc.)
6. Is this Tauri/Rust work?
--> Check: tauri-development skills, agent-teams:team-spawn tauri
7. Is this about documentation?
--> Check: codebase-mapper:docs-create
8. Is this about prompts or AI tooling?
--> Check: ai-tooling:prompt-optimize
9. Could any other installed skill apply?
--> Check the skill list in the system prompt
These thoughts mean STOP -- you are rationalizing not using a skill:
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can handle this without a skill" | If a skill exists for this, use it. |
| "This doesn't need a formal process" | Simple things become complex. Use the skill. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Overkill prevents underkill. Use it. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept != using the skill. Invoke it. |
| "Let me just write the code" | Did you settle the requirements? Did you plan? Check first. |
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
brainstorming, writing-plans, and executing-plans skills fill that slot.Examples:
These commands orchestrate multi-agent teams for complex tasks. Prefer them over invoking individual skills:
| Task | Command |
|---|---|
| Build a new feature end-to-end | /agent-teams:team-feature or /agent-teams:team-spawn fullstack |
| Full codebase review (deep-dive + review) | /senior-review:full-review |
| Mobile app from competitor analysis | /agent-teams:team-spawn app-analysis |
| Mobile app with Tauri build + review | /agent-teams:team-spawn tauri |
| Tauri desktop app review | /agent-teams:team-spawn tauri |
| Debug with competing hypotheses | /agent-teams:team-debug |
| Deep multi-source research | /agent-teams:team-research |
| Map an unfamiliar codebase | /agent-teams:team-codebase-map |
If the user's request matches a team scope, suggest the team command instead of invoking individual skills.
Rigid (TDD, review checklists): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away the discipline. The gates exist for a reason.
Flexible (react-best-practices, pwa-development): Adapt principles to context. Use judgment.
The skill itself tells you which type it is.
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip the process. It means use the process to deliver what was asked.
npx claudepluginhub acaprino/claude-code-daodan --plugin ai-toolingCreates, edits, and verifies skills using a test-driven development approach with pressure scenarios and subagents.