Skill for formal design review preparation and execution (PDR/CDR)
Manages formal design reviews (PDR/CDR) with agenda preparation, checklists, and action item tracking.
npx claudepluginhub a5c-ai/babysitterThis skill is limited to using the following tools:
The Design Review Management skill provides capabilities for preparing and executing formal design reviews (PDR/CDR), enabling systematic verification of design maturity and stakeholder alignment.
| Review | Timing | Purpose | Key Questions |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRR | Requirements phase | Requirements complete | Are requirements understood? |
| PDR | Preliminary design | Design approach approved | Will the design work? |
| CDR | Detailed design | Design ready for build | Is the design complete? |
| TRR | Test readiness | Ready for qualification | Can we test this? |
| PRR | Production | Ready for manufacturing | Can we build this? |
Entry criteria:
- Requirements baselined
- Preliminary design complete
- Key trade studies completed
- Risk assessment performed
- Preliminary analysis complete
Exit criteria:
- Design approach approved
- Requirements verified feasible
- Major risks identified and mitigated
- Development plan approved
- Resources allocated
Entry criteria:
- Detailed design complete
- All analysis complete
- Drawings released for review
- Bill of materials complete
- Manufacturing plan drafted
Exit criteria:
- Design frozen
- Analysis approved
- Drawings approved for release
- Manufacturing plan approved
- Test plan approved
Standard review agenda:
1. Introduction and objectives (15 min)
2. Requirements review (30 min)
3. Design overview (45 min)
4. Analysis summary (30 min)
5. Manufacturing approach (30 min)
6. Test approach (30 min)
7. Risk assessment (30 min)
8. Schedule and cost (15 min)
9. Action items and closure (30 min)
Documentation
Presentation Materials
Requirements:
[ ] All requirements allocated and traceable
[ ] Derived requirements documented
[ ] Interface requirements defined
[ ] Verification methods assigned
Design:
[ ] Design meets all requirements
[ ] Design intent documented
[ ] Material selections justified
[ ] Tolerances appropriate for function
[ ] Accessibility for maintenance
[ ] Safety considerations addressed
Analysis:
[ ] Structural analysis complete
[ ] Thermal analysis complete
[ ] Fatigue life adequate
[ ] Weight budget met
[ ] Margins documented
Manufacturing:
[ ] Design is manufacturable
[ ] Tolerances achievable
[ ] Special processes identified
[ ] Supplier capability verified
[ ] Cost estimate complete
For each risk:
[ ] Risk clearly defined
[ ] Likelihood assessed
[ ] Consequence assessed
[ ] Mitigation plan defined
[ ] Responsible party assigned
[ ] Target closure date set
[ ] Status tracked
| Role | Responsibility | Required/Optional |
|---|---|---|
| Chair | Lead review, decisions | Required |
| Secretary | Record actions | Required |
| Chief Engineer | Technical authority | Required |
| Design Lead | Present design | Required |
| Analysis Lead | Present analysis | Required |
| Manufacturing | Assess producibility | Required |
| Quality | Compliance verification | Required |
| Customer | Requirements owner | Situational |
Review outcomes:
- APPROVED: All criteria met, proceed to next phase
- CONDITIONAL: Proceed with identified conditions
- NOT APPROVED: Return to previous phase
Voting process:
- Unanimous for approval
- Document dissenting opinions
- Escalation path for unresolved issues
Required information:
- Unique ID
- Description
- Assigned to
- Due date
- Priority (high/medium/low)
- Status
- Closure criteria
- Resolution summary
Action item lifecycle:
1. Opened at review
2. Assigned and acknowledged
3. Work in progress
4. Resolution proposed
5. Reviewed and verified
6. Closed
{
"review_type": "SRR|PDR|CDR|TRR|PRR",
"project_info": {
"name": "string",
"phase": "string",
"schedule_date": "date"
},
"review_scope": {
"systems": "array",
"requirements": "array of requirement IDs"
},
"previous_actions": "array of action items",
"attendees": {
"required": "array",
"optional": "array"
}
}
{
"review_package": {
"agenda": "document reference",
"presentation": "file reference",
"checklists": "array of checklist references"
},
"review_results": {
"decision": "approved|conditional|not_approved",
"conditions": "array (if conditional)",
"action_items": [
{
"id": "string",
"description": "string",
"assigned_to": "string",
"due_date": "date",
"priority": "high|medium|low"
}
]
},
"maturity_assessment": {
"overall_score": "number (1-5)",
"by_area": "object",
"gaps_identified": "array"
},
"meeting_minutes": "document reference"
}
Activates when the user asks about AI prompts, needs prompt templates, wants to search for prompts, or mentions prompts.chat. Use for discovering, retrieving, and improving prompts.
Search, retrieve, and install Agent Skills from the prompts.chat registry using MCP tools. Use when the user asks to find skills, browse skill catalogs, install a skill for Claude, or extend Claude's capabilities with reusable AI agent components.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an agent", "add an agent", "write a subagent", "agent frontmatter", "when to use description", "agent examples", "agent tools", "agent colors", "autonomous agent", or needs guidance on agent structure, system prompts, triggering conditions, or agent development best practices for Claude Code plugins.