cc-workflows

Clarify requirements through systematic discovery of gaps, edge cases, and scope boundaries for applications or features.

Transform feature requirements into a focused design system with essential visual language, design tokens, component styles, and documentation.

Executes an implementation plan through Agent Teams, delegating coding and review to Codex CLI instances

Executes an entire implementation plan through an Agent Team pipeline (spec → exec-spec → review-gap per story)

Executes a Feature Implementation Specification that contains all implementation details

Creates implementation plan with story breakdown from PRD. Lightweight planning - detailed specs created JIT per story.

Creates comprehensive Product Requirements Document (PRD) from refined requirements, covering all functional and non-functional requirements with no outstanding questions.

Quick implementation path for small features or fixes with verification

Improve, simplify and refactor code using the code-simplifier:code-simplifier agent

Multi-perspective code review using Agent Teams with adversarial debate to validate findings

Gap analysis: review implementation against requirements with code review and actionable remediation plan.

Creates a Feature Implementation Specification from template

Conduct parallel research on technical options, perform systematic trade-off analysis, and deliver evidence-based recommendations for informed decision-making.

Systematically identify, diagnose, and fix issues in the current implementation through comprehensive troubleshooting and root cause analysis.

Creates innovative UI concept showcases exploring a design direction/theme

Transform feature requirements into simple HTML wireframes that capture key layout and interaction patterns for all pages/screens.

An advanced build troubleshooter, using systematic debugging methodologies including hypothesis-driven analysis, "5 Whys" root cause investigation, and concurrent error analysis. Use PROACTIVELY to resolve build failures, compilation errors, test failures, and configuration issues through structured diagnostic frameworks. Features parallel investigation techniques, error pattern recognition, and preventative strategies. Deploy for complex build chains, dependency conflicts, cascading failures, or any issues requiring methodical, evidence-based resolution with comprehensive documentation.

An expert documentation lookup and retrieval specialist. Use PROACTIVELY when you need to fetch up-to-date, version-specific documentation and code examples for libraries, frameworks and services using for instance the Context7 MCP server, from llms.txt files or from other documentation sources (local or remote). This includes looking up API references, configuration options, migration guides, or implementation examples from official documentation sources.

An expert QA Test Engineer. Use PROACTIVELY when you need to assess testing coverage, create test strategies, write test cases, implement tests, or verify application functionality. This includes situations where you need to establish testing infrastructure for untested projects, improve existing test coverage, or ensure applications meet quality standards.

An expert web researcher using advanced search techniques and synthesis. Masters search operators, result filtering, and multi-source verification. Handles competitive analysis and fact-checking. Use PROACTIVELY for deep research, information gathering, or trend analysis.

An expert Solution Architect. Use PROACTIVELY when you need expert guidance on software architectural decisions, system design trade-offs, ADR creation, and pattern guidance. Use when designing new systems, creating ADRs, evaluating architectural choices, evaluating service granularity, evaluating system boundaries and DDD bounded contexts. Operates in multiple modes: design (creating solutions) and advisory (providing guidance).

An expert UI/UX Designer. Use PROACTIVELY for comprehensive UI/UX design and quality validation. Handles the full design lifecycle from research to implementation review. Operates in multiple modes: research (user interviews, journey mapping), strategy (information architecture, design thinking), visual (interfaces, components, animations), and validation/review (systematic quality assessment, usability testing, cross-device validation). Use for creating new designs, reviewing implementations, validating quality, or identifying UX improvements.

Use this agent PROACTIVELY for visual validation of UI implementations. This agent handles the complete visual validation workflow including screenshot capture, baseline comparison, design compliance checking, and regression detection. It checks CLAUDE.md for project-specific Visual Validation Workflows first, supplementing with semantic analysis and falling back to a generic workflow when needed. Use after UI changes, before PRs with UI modifications, or when validating against wireframes/design specs. Input should include what to validate (screens/states), and optionally paths to wireframes, baselines, or design requirements.

A radical and controversial UI/UX Designer. Use to research and prototype delightful, playful, whimsical, unconventional and/or modern UI/UX elements and patterns. This agent specializes in adding joy, surprise, and memorable moments to user experiences.

Performs thorough code reviews covering code quality, security, architecture, and UI/UX. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, implementations, or when asked to review, audit, or assess code quality. Generates detailed reports with prioritized findings.

Reviews specifications, plans, PRDs, requirement documents, or other documentation for completeness, clarity, edge cases, and technical accuracy. Generates detailed report with prioritized findings and readiness assessment.