By tmdgusya
Enforce engineering discipline in AI-assisted development: clean LLM-generated code slop via tests, debug systematically with reproduce-first workflows, optimize performance using Rob Pike's measurement rules, apply Karpathy guidelines for precise changes, and orchestrate multi-day tasks through milestone planning, execution, and verification reviews.
Use when a user's request is vague, ambiguous, or underspecified. Launches an iterative Q&A loop to resolve ambiguity while a subagent explores the codebase in parallel. Outputs a clear, well-scoped context brief so the user can plan sharply. Triggers on "I want to...", "I need...", "let's build...", "can you help me...", "we should...", or any request where the full scope isn't immediately clear.
Corrective cleanup of AI-generated code — removes LLM-specific patterns while preserving behavior. Use when the user says "clean up", "deslop", "slop", "clean AI code", or when you spot LLM-generated code smells after any generation session.
Behavioral guardrails to prevent common LLM coding mistakes — enforces surgical changes, assumption verification, and scope discipline before and during implementation. Use when implementing features, modifying code, or when you notice yourself about to make changes without reading the existing code first.
Orchestrates multi-day execution of complex tasks through milestones. Each milestone goes through plan-crafting, run-plan (worker-validator), and review-work phases with checkpoint/recovery. Triggers when the user says "long run", "start long run", "execute milestones", or "run all milestones".
Decomposes complex, multi-day tasks into optimized milestones using parallel reviewer agents (ultraplan). Spawns 5 independent reviewers that analyze the problem from different angles, then synthesizes their findings into a milestone dependency DAG. Triggers when the user says "plan milestones", "break this into milestones", "ultraplan", or when long-run harness needs milestone generation.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Engineering discipline skills for AI coding agents. Works with Claude Code, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Codex, and Cursor.
Skills chain together to handle tasks from vague request to verified implementation:
User request
|
clarification ─── resolve ambiguity, explore codebase
|
|── Complexity Assessment (auto-routing)
| |
| |── Simple (score 5-8)
| | |
| | plan-crafting ─── create executable plan
| | |
| | run-plan ─── worker-validator execution loop
| | |
| | review-work ─── information-isolated verification
| |
| |── Complex (score 9-15)
| |
| milestone-planning ─── 5 parallel reviewers + synthesis
| |
| long-run ─── multi-day orchestrator
| |── M1: plan-crafting → run-plan → review-work → checkpoint
| |── M2: plan-crafting → run-plan → review-work → checkpoint
| |── ...
|
|── karpathy ─── implementation guardrails (before/during coding)
|── clean-ai-slop ─── post-generation AI code cleanup
|── simplify ─── post-implementation code quality pass
|── systematic-debugging ─── reproduce-first bug fixing
|── rob-pike ─── measurement-driven optimization
You don't need to memorize this. Each skill activates automatically based on trigger phrases and context.
Resolves vague requests into well-defined work scopes through iterative Q&A + parallel codebase exploration. Outputs a Context Brief with automatic complexity routing.
Triggers on: "I want to...", "I need...", "let's build...", or any request where scope isn't immediately clear.
Creates executable multi-step implementation plans from a clear scope. Every step contains actual code — no placeholders allowed.
Triggers on: "plan this", "create a plan", or after clarification completes with a Simple verdict.
Executes plans using worker-validator pairs. Workers implement, validators verify independently with zero knowledge of the worker's approach.
Triggers on: "run the plan", "execute the plan", or after plan-crafting completes.
Information-isolated post-execution verification. Reads only the plan document and the codebase — receives no execution logs or worker output.
Triggers on: "review the work", "verify the implementation", or after run-plan completes.
Reviews changed code through three parallel agents (reuse, quality, efficiency), then fixes any issues found.
Triggers on: "simplify", "clean up the code", "review the changes".
For complex tasks that span multiple days.
Spawns 5 independent reviewer agents in parallel — feasibility, architecture, risk, dependency, user value — then synthesizes their findings into an optimized milestone dependency DAG.
Triggers on: "plan milestones", "break this into milestones", "ultraplan", or after clarification with a Complex verdict (score 9-15).
Key features:
Orchestrates multi-day execution. Each milestone passes through plan-crafting, run-plan, review-work with checkpoint/recovery.
Triggers on: "long run", "start long run", "execute milestones".
Key features:
Preventive guardrails for code implementation — enforces surgical changes, assumption verification, and scope discipline before and during coding.
Triggers on: Before implementing features, modifying code, or when generating code without reading existing context first.
Corrective cleanup of AI-generated code. Removes LLM-specific patterns (over-commenting, unnecessary abstractions, defensive paranoia, verbose naming, filler) while preserving behavior. Regression-tests-first, single-smell-pass discipline.
Triggers on: "clean up", "deslop", "slop", "clean AI code", or after any significant generation session.
영어 프롬프트 학습 도우미 - 어휘력 확장 및 자연스러운 표현 학습
클럽의 샌드위치 가게 - Subway 주문 시스템
Generate minimal, effective AGENTS.md files using the Differential Context principle. Based on research showing verbose context files reduce agent performance.
Browser automation for web browsing, scraping, form filling, screenshots, and UI interaction using the robot CLI
Self-evolving skill system — learn reusable patterns from experience via Read-Write Reflective Learning
npx claudepluginhub tmdgusya/engineering-discipline --plugin engineering-disciplineVerification-first engineering toolkit for Claude Code. 15 skills across a 5-phase spine (Investigate → Design → Implement → Verify → Ship), 8 specialist agents, an interactive setup wizard. Every skill has rationalizations + evidence requirements. Built for senior ICs and tech leads.
Plan and autonomously build a software task end-to-end. Recons the codebase, applies preloaded memory, decomposes into the right number of phases, gets one confirmation, then prepares a single ready-to-paste /goal command — one paste between you and done — that drives execution to completion with built-in retry, fix-spec recovery, and per-phase memory writeback. Works on Claude Code and Codex.
Two Claude Code engineering skills bundled as one plugin: review-loop (cross-LLM iterative code review with Codex or Gemini as peer) and harness (cybernetics-based Planner→Generator→Evaluator→Retro orchestration for complex tasks).
Autonomous improvement engine for Claude Code. Runs an unbounded modify-verify-keep/discard loop against any mechanical metric. 10 subcommands: plan, debug, fix, security, ship, scenario, predict, learn, and reason.
Universal software engineering methodology: systematic debugging, safe refactoring, code review, incident response, technical debt triage, and codebase comprehension. Language-agnostic foundations for professional engineering practice.
19 software engineering skills from Code Complete, APOSD, GoF, and Clean Architecture. Skills are internal (slash-invocable; injected via Read() — not auto-triggered). Research → plan → build workflow with Gate-field adaptive gates (Full | Standard | Minimal) and per-phase orchestrated commits.