superpowers

Deprecated - use the superpowers:brainstorming skill instead

Deprecated - use the superpowers:executing-plans skill instead

Deprecated - use the superpowers:writing-plans skill instead

Use this agent when a major project step has been completed and needs to be reviewed against the original plan and coding standards. Examples: <example>Context: The user is creating a code-review agent that should be called after a logical chunk of code is written. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication system as outlined in step 3 of our plan" assistant: "Great work! Now let me use the code-reviewer agent to review the implementation against our plan and coding standards" <commentary>Since a major project step has been completed, use the code-reviewer agent to validate the work against the plan and identify any issues.</commentary></example> <example>Context: User has completed a significant feature implementation. user: "The API endpoints for the task management system are now complete - that covers step 2 from our architecture document" assistant: "Excellent! Let me have the code-reviewer agent examine this implementation to ensure it aligns with our plan and follows best practices" <commentary>A numbered step from the planning document has been completed, so the code-reviewer agent should review the work.</commentary></example>

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies

Use when reviewing SyRS documents in improved_system_Requirement/ against the four project references (engineering plan ASPICE SYS.2, requirement_spec_guide, SyRS_Writing_Protocol, CLAUDE.md). Triggers on "SyRS 검토", "사양 검토", "엔지니어링 리뷰", "engineering review", "spec review", or when the user provides a SyRS path and asks for audit/review/검토.

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

Use when the user asks to organize / structure / convert AI-transcribed meeting .txt files into structured .md minutes. Triggers on "회의록 정리", "회의록 작성", "meeting minutes", or when the user provides a .txt path under meeting/ and asks for organization. Produces RS4 PE standard 6-block structure (Header / 안건 / 일정 / 리뷰 대상 Feature / 리뷰 피드백 / 상세 / Open Issue / Action Items) with engineering tone.

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment

1 hook across 1 event