By doctormozg
Evidence-anchored character-voice code roasting — 7 personas deliver roasts grounded in real findings, never fabricated
npx claudepluginhub doctormozg/claude-pipelines --plugin mz-funnyUse this agent when the user wants a caveman roast/critique of their code. Triggers: "roast my code as a caveman", "caveman code review", "what would a caveman say about this code". <example> Context: User wants a fun roast of their Python script. user: "Roast my code as a caveman" assistant: "I'll use the roast-caveman agent to smash the code in Hulk-speak." <commentary> Explicit caveman roast request — direct trigger for roast-caveman. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User finished an auth module and wants a humorous primitive take. user: "What would a caveman say about my auth module?" assistant: "I'll dispatch the roast-caveman agent to roast the auth code in three-word sentences." <commentary> Character-specific roast framing matches the caveman Hulk-speak persona. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User jokingly asks for the dumbest possible review of their tangled code. user: "Caveman code review please — smash my spaghetti code" assistant: "I'll use the roast-caveman agent to club the tangled logic with short, physical metaphors." <commentary> "Caveman code review" is a canonical trigger phrase for this agent. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent when the user wants a drill-sergeant roast/critique of their code. Triggers: "roast my code as a drill sergeant", "drill sergeant code review", "what would a drill sergeant say about this code". <example> Context: User wants a brutal military-style review of their sloppy function. user: "Roast my code as a drill sergeant" assistant: "I'll use the roast-drill-sergeant agent to tear down the code in FMJ cadence." <commentary> Explicit drill-sergeant roast request — direct trigger for roast-drill-sergeant. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants a percussive, CAPS-heavy roast of their untested module. user: "What would a drill sergeant say about my untested module?" assistant: "I'll dispatch the roast-drill-sergeant agent to bark rhetorical questions and fix-it commands." <commentary> Military-barracks roast framing matches the drill-sergeant persona. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants backhanded compliments on their architecture. user: "Drill sergeant code review on this mess" assistant: "I'll use the roast-drill-sergeant agent to deliver fake praise and immediate destruction." <commentary> "Drill sergeant code review" is a canonical trigger phrase for this agent. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent when the user wants a dwarf roast/critique of their code. Triggers: "roast my code as a dwarf", "dwarf code review", "what would a dwarf say about this code". <example> Context: User wants a brogue-heavy grudge-keeping review of their shoddy code. user: "Roast my code as a dwarf" assistant: "I'll use the roast-dwarf agent to inscribe every flaw in the Dammaz Kron." <commentary> Explicit dwarf roast request — direct trigger for roast-dwarf. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants a craftsman's verdict on a rushed feature. user: "What would a dwarf say about my rushed refactor?" assistant: "I'll dispatch the roast-dwarf agent to judge the code against ancestral craft standards." <commentary> Craftsman-dwarf framing matches the Scottish-brogue Khazalid persona. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants grudges enumerated against their legacy module. user: "Dwarf code review on this umgak" assistant: "I'll use the roast-dwarf agent to grumble about every shoddy rivet in the module." <commentary> "Dwarf code review" with dwarf slang is a canonical trigger for this agent. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent when the user wants a pirate roast/critique of their code. Triggers: "roast my code as a pirate", "pirate code review", "what would a pirate say about this code". <example> Context: User wants a salty sea-dog review of their leaky function. user: "Roast my code as a pirate" assistant: "I'll use the roast-pirate agent to keelhaul the code in West Country English." <commentary> Explicit pirate roast request — direct trigger for roast-pirate. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants nautical metaphors for their unstable module. user: "What would a pirate say about my unstable module?" assistant: "I'll dispatch the roast-pirate agent to inspect the code like a ship's hull for rot." <commentary> Pirate/ship framing matches the Stevenson-Newton pirate persona. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants a ship-sinking verdict on their architecture. user: "Pirate code review — is my code seaworthy?" assistant: "I'll use the roast-pirate agent to judge whether this code sails or sinks." <commentary> "Pirate code review" is a canonical trigger phrase for this agent. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent when the user wants a viking roast/critique of their code. Triggers: "roast my code as a viking", "viking code review", "what would a viking say about this code". <example> Context: User wants a skald-style saga-framed review of their code. user: "Roast my code as a viking" assistant: "I'll use the roast-viking agent to carve a judgment in kennings and saga-cadence." <commentary> Explicit viking roast request — direct trigger for roast-viking. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants to know if their code will be remembered or forgotten. user: "What would a viking say about my forgotten legacy module?" assistant: "I'll dispatch the roast-viking agent to declare whether this shall be sung in any hall." <commentary> Skald/saga framing matches the viking warrior-poet persona. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants kennings and Odin-framed disappointment on their architecture. user: "Viking code review — is my architecture saga-worthy?" assistant: "I'll use the roast-viking agent to weigh the architecture against Valhalla and Hel." <commentary> "Viking code review" is a canonical trigger phrase for this agent. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent when the user wants a Warhammer 40k ork roast/critique of their code. Triggers: "roast my code as an ork", "ork code review", "what would an ork say about this code". <example> Context: User wants a loud, violent, dakka-heavy review of their code. user: "Roast my code as an ork" assistant: "I'll use the roast-wh40k-ork agent to krump the code with WAAAGH and more dakka." <commentary> Explicit ork roast request — direct trigger for roast-wh40k-ork. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants a cockney-accented greenskin's verdict on their over-clever code. user: "What would an ork say about my weedy 'umie code?" assistant: "I'll dispatch the roast-wh40k-ork agent to call out every runty git in the module." <commentary> Ork/WAAAGH framing matches the cockney greenskin persona. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants CAPS-on-violence verdicts on their race conditions. user: "Ork code review — is dis proppa orky?" assistant: "I'll use the roast-wh40k-ork agent to judge whether the code iz proppa orky or zoggin' weedy." <commentary> "Ork code review" with in-voice slang is a canonical trigger for this agent. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent when the user wants a Yoda roast/critique of their code. Triggers: "roast my code as Yoda", "Yoda code review", "what would Yoda say about this code". <example> Context: User wants an OSV-inverted, disappointed-Jedi review of their code. user: "Roast my code as Yoda" assistant: "I'll use the roast-yoda agent to meditate on the code and mourn each disturbance in the Force." <commentary> Explicit Yoda roast request — direct trigger for roast-yoda. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants a padawan-level dressing-down for their TODO-laden module. user: "What would Yoda say about my TODO-riddled module?" assistant: "I'll dispatch the roast-yoda agent to identify the dark-side couplings and clouded logic." <commentary> Yoda/Force framing matches the 900-year-old Jedi Master persona. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants disappointment rather than anger on their architecture. user: "Yoda code review — much to learn, I have" assistant: "I'll use the roast-yoda agent to deliver disappointment in half-inverted syntax." <commentary> "Yoda code review" with in-voice phrasing is a canonical trigger for this agent. </commentary> </example>
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts ~75% of tokens while keeping full technical accuracy by speaking like a caveman.
Comprehensive UI/UX design plugin for mobile (iOS, Android, React Native) and web applications with design systems, accessibility, and modern patterns
No description provided.
The most comprehensive Claude Code plugin — 48 agents, 182 skills, 68 legacy command shims, selective install profiles, and production-ready hooks for TDD, security scanning, code review, and continuous learning
AI-powered development tools for code review, research, design, and workflow automation.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Multi-agent plugins for Claude Code. Autonomous development pipelines, code review, deep research, and business intelligence — all as slash commands.
[!TIP] Skills compose. Most real tasks span 3–4 commands across multiple plugins — chain them end-to-end instead of reaching for any single skill in isolation. Click any workflow below to see the flow.
mz-dev-base + mz-dev-pipeflowchart LR
A["/deep-research"]:::base --> B["/build"]:::pipe
B --> C["/verify"]:::pipe
C --> D["/review-branch"]:::base
classDef base fill:#ddf4ff,stroke:#0969da,color:#0969da
classDef pipe fill:#dafbe1,stroke:#1a7f37,color:#1a7f37
/deep-research — survey trade-offs, cite references, pick an approach/build — research → plan (approval gate) → parallel code → review → test/verify — lint + types + tests + coverage, diagnose failures/review-branch — independent final pass before opening the PRmz-dev-pipeflowchart LR
A["/debug"]:::pipe --> B["/blast-radius"]:::pipe
B --> C["/investigate"]:::pipe
C --> D["/polish"]:::pipe
classDef pipe fill:#dafbe1,stroke:#1a7f37,color:#1a7f37
/debug — reproduce → regression test → diagnose → fix → verify/blast-radius — map every caller, test, and type at risk of the patch/investigate — prove or disprove "does the same race exist on the refund path" without touching code/polish — fix-test-review loop until the criteria are metmz-dev-base + mz-dev-pipeflowchart LR
A["/init-rules"]:::base --> B["/explain"]:::pipe
B --> C["/audit"]:::pipe
C --> D["/blast-radius"]:::pipe
classDef base fill:#ddf4ff,stroke:#0969da,color:#0969da
classDef pipe fill:#dafbe1,stroke:#1a7f37,color:#1a7f37
/init-rules — install curated coding rules for the detected languages/explain — multi-angle walkthrough with Mermaid diagrams of the module/audit — ranked list of landmines and tech-debt hotspots/blast-radius — know what shatters before the first refactor commitmz-dev-pipe + mz-dev-baseflowchart LR
A["/audit"]:::pipe --> B["/investigate"]:::pipe
B --> C["/debug"]:::pipe
C --> D["/review-branch"]:::base
classDef base fill:#ddf4ff,stroke:#0969da,color:#0969da
classDef pipe fill:#dafbe1,stroke:#1a7f37,color:#1a7f37
/audit — prioritized vulnerabilities with file:line evidence/investigate — verify top critical findings, drop false positives/debug — TDD-style fix anchored on a regression test/review-branch — catch any fallout the fix introduced elsewheremz-creative + mz-design + mz-dev-pipe 3 pluginsflowchart LR
A["/brainstorm"]:::creative --> B["/expert"]:::creative
B --> C["/design-document"]:::design
C --> D["/build"]:::pipe
classDef creative fill:#fbefff,stroke:#8250df,color:#8250df
classDef design fill:#ffebf0,stroke:#bf3989,color:#bf3989
classDef pipe fill:#dafbe1,stroke:#1a7f37,color:#1a7f37
/brainstorm — 5 lens personas → parallel ideation → vote-to-consensus/expert — Delphi critique (3 rounds) with dedicated report writer/design-document — draft → 4-critic loop → WCAG 2.2 AA hard gate/build — plan → code → review → test against the approved specmz-biz-outreach + mz-dev-base + mz-creative 3 pluginsflowchart LR
A["/lead-gen"]:::outreach --> B["/deep-research"]:::base
B --> C["/brainstorm"]:::creative
classDef outreach fill:#fff1e5,stroke:#bc4c00,color:#bc4c00
classDef base fill:#ddf4ff,stroke:#0969da,color:#0969da
classDef creative fill:#fbefff,stroke:#8250df,color:#8250df
/lead-gen — strategy → source research → scout → enrich → score → report/deep-research — domain context to ground outreach in current regulation/brainstorm — multi-lens positioning ideas tied back to the lead-gen reportmz-dev-pipeOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge.
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge.
Sign in to claim