By bradwindy
Deep code review with 23+ specialist Opus agents. Full call-graph tracing, web-verified findings, adversarial false-positive filtering. Supports GitHub PRs, GitLab MRs, and local branch comparisons.
Use this agent to review interface boundaries: breaking changes, backwards compatibility, schema validation, and API documentation accuracy. <example> Context: A PR changes a REST API endpoint's response format. user: "Check if this API change is backwards compatible" assistant: "I'll use the api-contract-reviewer to check for breaking changes and schema alignment." <commentary> Response format changes can break existing clients. Need backwards compatibility analysis. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent to check whether changes respect existing architecture: layer violations, inappropriate coupling, circular module dependencies, and separation of concerns. <example> Context: A PR has a React component importing directly from the database layer. user: "Check architectural boundaries" assistant: "I'll use the architecture-boundary reviewer to check for layer violations." <commentary> UI components importing database modules violates separation of concerns. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent to identify unnecessary complexity: over-engineering, premature abstractions, dead code, and redundant patterns. Based on Anthropic's code-simplifier. <example> Context: A PR adds a factory pattern for creating a single type of object. user: "Is this over-engineered?" assistant: "I'll use the code-simplification reviewer to identify unnecessary complexity." <commentary> Factory patterns for single types are premature abstractions - simpler construction suffices. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent to check whether code changes honor inline comment directives like "do not modify without updating X" or "this must stay in sync with Y." <example> Context: A file has a comment "WARNING: if you change this function, update the migration script." user: "Check if inline directives were followed" assistant: "I'll use the comment-compliance-checker to verify all inline directives were honored." <commentary> Inline directives represent maintenance contracts that changes must honor. </commentary> </example>
Use this agent to verify factual accuracy of code comments, find misleading documentation, and identify places where complex logic lacks explanation. Based on Anthropic's comment-analyzer. <example> Context: A PR modifies function behavior but doesn't update the JSDoc above it. user: "Check if comments are accurate" assistant: "I'll use the comment-quality-reviewer to verify comments match implementation." <commentary> Stale comments are worse than no comments - they mislead future developers. </commentary> </example>
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Deep code review plugin for Claude Code. Spawns a 23-agent team to review PRs, MRs, or branch comparisons.
/plugin marketplace add bradwindy/ultimate-code-review
/plugin install ultimate-code-review@ultimate-code-review
/ultimate-code-review https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123
CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1gh CLI (for GitHub PRs)glab CLI (for GitLab MRs)git (always required)# Add the marketplace
/plugin marketplace add bradwindy/ultimate-code-review
# Install the plugin
/plugin install ultimate-code-review@ultimate-code-review
git clone [email protected]:bradwindy/ultimate-code-review.git
claude --plugin-dir ./ultimate-code-review
# Review current branch vs upstream
/ultimate-code-review
# Review a specific PR
/ultimate-code-review https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123
# Review a specific MR
/ultimate-code-review https://gitlab.com/org/repo/-/merge_requests/456
# Review local branch comparison
/ultimate-code-review feature..main
# Also post summary to PR/MR
/ultimate-code-review --post https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123
Three-phase review:
All agents verify technical claims against the web. No reliance on internal knowledge.
23 specialist agents with non-overlapping scopes:
Bug-Focused (1-7): Deep Bug Scanner, Side Effects Analyzer, Concurrency Reviewer, Silent Failure Hunter, Data Flow Analyzer, Memory & Resource Analyzer, Performance Analyzer
Security & Types (8-10): Security Auditor, Type Design Reviewer, API Contract Reviewer
Context & Quality (11-23): Git History Analyzer, Cross-PR Learning Agent, Guidelines Compliance, Comment Compliance Checker, Comment Quality Reviewer, Dependency Analyzer, Code Simplification, Style Consistency, Test Coverage Analyzer, Architecture Boundary, Logging & Observability, Migration & Deployment Risk, Scope Relevance Reviewer
Synthesis (24-25): Synthesizer, Devil's Advocate
This plugin uses 23+ Opus agents at max effort. Expect significant token usage ($5-50+ per review depending on diff size). This is by design -- depth over economy.
MIT -- see LICENSE for details.
Build and manage iOS/macOS apps using native xcodebuild and xcrun simctl CLI tools.
Write robust, maintainable XCUITests for iOS and macOS applications.
Cost-optimized skills library for Claude Code: brainstorm, research, plan, and execute workflows with consolidated agents
npx claudepluginhub bradwindy/ultimate-code-review --plugin ultimate-code-reviewMulti-agent code review for Claude Code — parallel review by Codex (GPT-5.5), Gemini 3.1 Pro, and five Claude specialist subagents (one run blind), then verified synthesis.
Multi-lens code review pipeline: deep review (Claude or Codex), automated fix loop, interactive walkthrough, manual promote, external-finding injection.
AI-powered code review in Claude Code, powered by CodeRabbit
Automated code review for pull requests using multiple specialized agents with confidence-based scoring
Code review plugin with a standalone reviewer agent and two skill strategies: disposable subagents for one-shot reviews and persistent team members for iterative reviews
Comprehensive code review with parallel specialized agents covering security, architecture, performance, and more