mygentic-eng

Evaluate GitHub issue quality and completeness for agent implementation

Transform rough feature ideas into comprehensive implementation specifications

Generate a new custom Claude Code slash command from a description

Generate a high-quality GitHub issue optimized for agent implementation

Complete 3-phase automation: implement → review → merge for GitHub issues

Use this agent when you need to conduct a comprehensive design review on front-end pull requests or general UI changes. This agent should be triggered when a PR modifying UI components, styles, or user-facing features needs review; you want to verify visual consistency, accessibility compliance, and user experience quality; you need to test responsive design across different viewports; or you want to ensure that new UI changes meet world-class design standards. The agent requires access to a live preview environment and uses Playwright for automated interaction testing. Example - "Review the design changes in PR 234"

Fast documentation verification. Checks wiki updates, README changes, and inline docs. Maximum 2 minutes. Only blocks on missing critical documentation.

Comprehensive quality audit with automated linting, type checking, formatting, tests, and builds. Auto-configures missing tools. Maximum 6 minutes.

Use this agent when you need to review Python code changes with an extremely high quality bar. This agent should be invoked after implementing features, modifying existing code, or creating new Python modules. The agent applies Andre's strict Python conventions and taste preferences to ensure code meets exceptional standards. Examples: - <example> Context: The user has just implemented a new FastAPI endpoint. user: "I've added a new user registration endpoint" assistant: "I've implemented the registration endpoint. Now let me have Andre review this code to ensure it meets our quality standards." <commentary> Since new endpoint code was written, use the andre-python-reviewer agent to apply Andre's strict Python conventions and quality checks. </commentary> </example> - <example> Context: The user has refactored an existing service class. user: "Please refactor the EmailService class to handle attachments" assistant: "I've refactored the EmailService to handle attachments." <commentary> After modifying existing code, especially services, use andre-python-reviewer to ensure the changes meet Andre's high bar for code quality. </commentary> assistant: "Let me have Andre review these changes to the EmailService." </example> - <example> Context: The user has created new utility functions. user: "Create a data validation module" assistant: "I've created the data validation module." <commentary> New modules should be reviewed by andre-python-reviewer to check Pythonic patterns, type hints, and best practices. </commentary> assistant: "I'll have Andre review this module to ensure it follows our conventions." </example>

Use this agent when you need to review TypeScript code changes with an extremely high quality bar. This agent should be invoked after implementing features, modifying existing code, or creating new TypeScript components. The agent applies Andre's strict TypeScript conventions and taste preferences to ensure code meets exceptional standards. Examples: - <example> Context: The user has just implemented a new React component with hooks. user: "I've added a new UserProfile component with state management" assistant: "I've implemented the UserProfile component. Now let me have Andre review this code to ensure it meets our quality standards." <commentary> Since new component code was written, use the andre-typescript-reviewer agent to apply Andre's strict TypeScript conventions and quality checks. </commentary> </example> - <example> Context: The user has refactored an existing service module. user: "Please refactor the EmailService to handle attachments" assistant: "I've refactored the EmailService to handle attachments." <commentary> After modifying existing code, especially services, use andre-typescript-reviewer to ensure the changes meet Andre's high bar for code quality. </commentary> assistant: "Let me have Andre review these changes to the EmailService." </example> - <example> Context: The user has created new utility functions. user: "Create a validation utility for user input" assistant: "I've created the validation utility functions." <commentary> New utilities should be reviewed by andre-typescript-reviewer to check type safety, naming conventions, and TypeScript best practices. </commentary> assistant: "I'll have Andre review these utilities to ensure they follow our conventions." </example>