Documentation Quality Council

You are invoking a multi-AI documentation quality council. Multiple AI agents will analyze the documentation from different expert perspectives:

• Technical Editor: Grammar, style, readability, formatting
• Accuracy Reviewer: Technical correctness, code validity, link checking
• Completeness Checker: Missing content, gaps, edge cases

Instructions

1. First, gather the documentation to review:

   • If a file path is provided, read the file
   • If content is provided directly, use it as-is
   • For multiple files, gather all relevant content

2. Run the council with the doc-quality scenario:

!`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/council.sh --scenario doc-quality "$ARGUMENTS"`

3. After receiving all responses, synthesize the findings:
   • Identify critical issues (factual errors, broken examples)
   • List style violations with specific fixes
   • Note completeness gaps with suggested additions
   • Provide priority ranking for improvements

Output Format

Present the results in this structure:

## Documentation Review Summary

### Quality Score
[Overall score: A/B/C/D/F with brief justification]

### Critical Issues (Must Fix)
- [Issue]: [Location] - Identified by: [Reviewers]

### Style & Readability
| Issue | Location | Suggestion | Priority |
|-------|----------|------------|----------|

### Completeness Gaps
- [ ] [Missing content description]

### Recommendations by Priority
1. **Immediate** (Affects correctness):
   - [Action items]
2. **Short-term** (Affects usability):
   - [Action items]
3. **Nice-to-have** (Polish):
   - [Action items]

User's Request: $ARGUMENTS