Validate PRP Quality

PRP File: $ARGUMENTS

Review a PRP (Pre-Requirements Plan) file for completeness and implementation readiness.

Validation Checklist

Research and Context

• All research context included with URLs
• Tech stack properly identified (framework, build tools, testing)
• External documentation links provided
• Code examples from codebase referenced

Implementation Planning

• Implementation phases clearly defined
• Each phase has specific deliverables
• Validation commands match project setup
• Manual testing steps provided for each phase

Technical Details

• Error handling strategy documented
• Existing patterns properly referenced
• Incremental milestones defined
• Edge cases considered

Execution Readiness

• All TODOs and placeholders resolved
• Dependencies clearly listed
• Environment setup documented
• Success criteria measurable

Analysis Process

1. Structural Review

   • Check for all required PRP sections
   • Verify phase breakdown is logical
   • Ensure validation points are clear

2. Technical Assessment

   • Validate that tech stack matches project
   • Check if referenced patterns exist in codebase
   • Confirm validation commands will work

3. Completeness Check

   • Scan for missing implementation details
   • Identify any ambiguous requirements
   • Flag incomplete research areas

Output

Quality Score (1-10)

Rate the PRP's readiness for execution:

• 1-3: Major gaps, needs significant work
• 4-6: Good foundation, some areas need completion
• 7-8: Well-defined, minor improvements possible
• 9-10: Comprehensive and execution-ready

Feedback Report

• Strengths: What the PRP does well
• Missing Elements: Critical gaps to address
• Research Gaps: Areas needing more documentation
• Implementation Concerns: Potential execution challenges

Recommended Actions

• Ready to execute: Proceed with /execute-prp
• Needs completion: Specific sections to enhance
• Requires validation: Commands to verify first
• Research needed: External resources to gather