Review Course

Comprehensive, course-wide review examining consistency, completeness, structure, and quality across all course materials.

Interactive Workflow

Step 1: Course Selection

Which course would you like to review?

[1] C++ Fundamentals (Junior Developers)
[2] [Other configured courses...]
[3] Specify course directory path

Please select an option:

Step 2: Review Scope

What scope of review would you like?

[1] Full course review (all aspects, all materials)
[2] Structure and organization only
[3] Content consistency only
[4] Learning objectives alignment
[5] Custom scope

Please select an option:

Step 3: Review Depth

How thorough should the review be?

[1] Quick scan (identify major issues, 15-30 min)
[2] Standard review (thorough analysis, 1-2 hours)
[3] Deep audit (comprehensive evaluation, 2-4+ hours)

Please select an option:

Step 4: Focus Areas (Optional)

Are there specific areas of concern?

[1] No specific concerns - review everything
[2] Code correctness is a priority
[3] Pedagogical quality is a priority
[4] Consistency is a priority
[5] Completeness is a priority

Please select an option:

Step 5: Generate Review

The course-reviewer agent will analyze the entire course and provide a comprehensive report.

What Gets Reviewed

Course Architecture

• Learning objectives and their coverage
• Prerequisite chain and dependencies
• Topic sequencing and logical flow
• Scope appropriateness for duration

Content Quality

• Code correctness in all examples
• Technical accuracy of explanations
• Pedagogical effectiveness
• Audience appropriateness

Consistency

• Terminology usage across all materials
• Code style uniformity
• Formatting and structure patterns
• Writing voice and tone

Completeness

• Coverage of all stated objectives
• Gap identification
• Practice opportunity sufficiency
• Assessment alignment

Cross-References

• Internal link validity
• Prerequisite reference accuracy
• Callback correctness
• Continuation references

What the Agent Does

The course-reviewer agent will:

Discovery:

• Identify all course materials (chapters, exercises, labs, etc.)
• Load the course profile to understand standards
• Map the course structure and dependencies

Analysis:

• Review each piece of content systematically
• Check code examples for correctness
• Evaluate explanations for clarity and accuracy
• Assess consistency across materials
• Identify gaps and redundancies

Cross-Referencing:

• Track terminology usage
• Verify internal references
• Check prerequisite assumptions
• Validate learning objective coverage

Synthesis:

• Compile findings by category and severity
• Prioritize recommendations
• Provide actionable improvement steps
• Generate comprehensive report

Output

Comprehensive course review report:

## Course Review Report: [Course Name]

### Executive Summary
- Overall course quality assessment
- Key strengths (what works well)
- Priority action items (what needs attention)

### Course Architecture Assessment
- Learning objectives evaluation
- Structure and sequencing analysis
- Scope and pacing assessment

### Content Quality Assessment
- Code correctness findings
- Technical accuracy findings
- Pedagogical quality findings

### Consistency Assessment
- Terminology consistency
- Style consistency
- Structural consistency

### Completeness Assessment
- Coverage analysis
- Gap identification
- Practice sufficiency

### Detailed Findings

#### Critical Issues (Must Fix)
| Location | Issue | Recommendation |
|----------|-------|----------------|

#### Major Issues (Should Fix)
| Location | Issue | Recommendation |
|----------|-------|----------------|

#### Minor Issues (Nice to Fix)
| Location | Issue | Recommendation |
|----------|-------|----------------|

### Enhancement Opportunities
- [Suggestion 1]
- [Suggestion 2]

### Recommended Action Plan
1. Immediate actions (address critical issues)
2. Short-term improvements (address major issues)
3. Long-term enhancements (continuous improvement)

### Appendix: Metrics
- Total modules reviewed: X
- Code examples checked: X
- Issues found by category
- Quality scores by dimension

Usage Notes

• For best results, ensure all course materials are accessible
• Review may take significant time for large courses
• The agent will ask clarifying questions if needed
• Results should be saved for tracking improvements over time
• Re-run after making changes to verify fixes