Refactor Strategy
Overview
Create a comprehensive, risk-mitigated strategy for refactoring legacy code or large-scale architectural changes. This command helps plan refactoring that can be done incrementally without breaking production systems.
Steps
1. Assess Current State
Understand the Problem
- What are the pain points with the current code?
- Why does it need refactoring?
- What specific issues are you trying to solve?
- What is the business impact?
Analyze the Codebase
- Code complexity metrics (cyclomatic complexity, nesting depth)
- Code duplication
- Test coverage
- Dependencies and coupling
- Technical debt accumulation
- Performance bottlenecks
Identify Constraints
- Must maintain backward compatibility?
- Zero downtime requirement?
- Team size and expertise
- Time and budget constraints
- External dependencies
2. Define Target State
Desired Outcome
- What does "good" look like?
- What architectural pattern are you moving toward?
- What will be better after refactoring?
- How will you measure success?
Success Metrics
- Code quality metrics improvement
- Performance improvements
- Reduction in bugs/incidents
- Developer velocity increase
- Test coverage increase
3. Risk Assessment
Identify risks:
- Breaking Changes: What could break?
- Data Migration: Does data need to be migrated?
- Downtime: Will there be service interruption?
- Performance: Could performance degrade?
- Team Knowledge: Does the team understand the changes?
- Dependencies: What external systems are affected?
For each risk:
- Likelihood: High/Medium/Low
- Impact: High/Medium/Low
- Mitigation: How to reduce risk?
4. Choose Refactoring Strategy
Strangler Fig Pattern (Recommended for Large Changes)
- Build new system alongside old
- Gradually route traffic to new system
- Decommission old system once fully replaced
- Pros: Low risk, incremental, can rollback
- Cons: Temporary complexity, longer timeline
Big Bang Refactor
- Rewrite everything at once
- Deploy all changes together
- Pros: Clean break, simpler during refactor
- Cons: High risk, long development, difficult rollback
Branch by Abstraction
- Create abstraction layer
- Implement new version behind abstraction
- Switch implementations
- Remove abstraction once complete
- Pros: No branching issues, incremental
- Cons: Requires careful abstraction design
Feature Flags
- Deploy both old and new code
- Use flags to control which version runs
- Gradually roll out new version
- Pros: Easy rollback, gradual rollout
- Cons: Code complexity during transition
5. Break Down Into Phases
Create incremental phases:
Phase 1: Foundation
- Set up new structure
- Add comprehensive tests
- Create abstractions
- No user-facing changes
Phase 2: Parallel Implementation
- Implement new version alongside old
- Verify correctness
- Shadow traffic for testing
Phase 3: Gradual Migration
- Route small percentage of traffic
- Monitor metrics
- Increase percentage if stable
Phase 4: Complete Migration
- Route all traffic to new version
- Keep old version for rollback
- Monitor for issues
Phase 5: Cleanup
- Remove old code
- Remove feature flags
- Update documentation
Each phase should:
- Be independently deployable
- Take 1-4 weeks
- Have clear success criteria
- Be reversible
6. Testing Strategy
Before Refactoring
- Add characterization tests (test current behavior)
- Increase test coverage of areas being changed
- Document current behavior
During Refactoring
- Maintain or increase test coverage
- Add tests for new code
- Ensure tests pass after each change
- Use TDD for new implementations
After Refactoring
- Run full regression test suite
- Performance testing
- Load testing
- Security testing
- User acceptance testing
Testing Techniques
- Parallel Run: Run old and new code, compare outputs
- Shadow Traffic: Send copy of real traffic to new code
- Canary Deployment: Deploy to small percentage of users
- Blue-Green Deployment: Switch between old and new versions
- A/B Testing: Compare metrics between versions
7. Data Migration Plan (if applicable)
Assess Data Changes
- Schema changes needed?
- Data transformations required?
- Historical data migration?
Migration Strategy
- Dual Writes: Write to both old and new datastores
- Backfill: Migrate historical data in background
- Validation: Verify data consistency
- Rollback: Plan for reverting data changes
Steps
- Add dual writes (write to old and new)
- Backfill historical data
- Validate data consistency
- Switch reads to new datastore
- Stop writes to old datastore
- Archive old data
8. Deployment Strategy
Gradual Rollout
- Deploy to dev environment
- Deploy to staging
- Deploy to production (1% of traffic)
- Monitor metrics
- Increase to 10%, 50%, 100%
Monitoring During Rollout
- Error rates
- Response times
- Resource utilization
- Business metrics
- User feedback
Rollback Plan
- Automated rollback triggers
- Manual rollback procedure
- How quickly can you rollback?
- Data rollback considerations
9. Communication Plan
Team Communication
- Share refactoring plan with team
- Conduct design review
- Pair programming for complex parts
- Daily standups during critical phases
- Retrospectives after each phase
Stakeholder Communication
- Explain business value
- Communicate timeline
- Set expectations for disruptions
- Report progress regularly
- Celebrate milestones
Documentation
- Update architecture docs
- Create runbooks
- Document new patterns
- Update onboarding materials
- Record decisions and tradeoffs
10. Implementation Guidelines
Code Quality Standards
- Follow existing code style
- Use consistent naming
- Add meaningful comments
- Keep functions small
- Reduce complexity
Incremental Changes
- Small, frequent commits
- Each commit should compile and pass tests
- Frequent deployments
- Quick feedback loops
Continuous Monitoring
- Set up dashboards
- Create alerts for anomalies
- Track key metrics
- Log important events
11. Create Refactoring Backlog
Break work into stories:
- Each story should be completable in 1-3 days
- Stories should be independently valuable
- Prioritize by risk and value
- Include testing and documentation tasks
Example stories:
- Add characterization tests for UserService
- Extract UserRepository interface
- Implement new UserRepository with PostgreSQL
- Add feature flag for UserRepository selection
- Deploy with flag disabled
- Enable flag for 1% of traffic
- Monitor and increase to 100%
- Remove old implementation
12. Post-Refactoring Review
After completion:
- Measure against success metrics
- Conduct retrospective
- Document lessons learned
- Identify remaining technical debt
- Plan next refactoring iteration
Checklist
Examples
Example 1: Refactor Monolith to Microservices
/refactor-strategy
Plan migration of our monolithic e-commerce app to microservices:
- Current: Single Django app, 100k LOC, PostgreSQL
- Target: 5 microservices (users, products, orders, payments, notifications)
- Constraints: Zero downtime, maintain existing APIs
- Timeline: 6 months
Example 2: Replace Legacy Authentication System
/refactor-strategy
Migrate from custom auth to Auth0:
- Current: Custom JWT implementation, user database
- Target: Auth0 with OAuth 2.0
- 50k active users
- Must migrate existing user accounts
- Maintain current user experience
Example 3: Database Migration
/refactor-strategy
Migrate from MySQL to PostgreSQL:
- 500GB database
- 24/7 uptime requirement
- Complex queries using MySQL-specific features
- Need to test query performance
Best Practices
- Test First: Add tests before refactoring
- Incremental Changes: Small, frequent deployments
- Measure Everything: Track metrics before and after
- Communicate Often: Keep team and stakeholders informed
- Plan for Rollback: Always have an escape hatch
- Pair Program: Complex refactoring benefits from collaboration
- Document Decisions: Explain why, not just what
- Celebrate Progress: Acknowledge milestones
- Learn and Iterate: Adjust strategy based on feedback
- Don't Gold-Plate: Focus on solving the problem, not perfection
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- Big Bang Refactor: Rewriting everything at once
- Refactor Without Tests: Changing code without safety net
- Scope Creep: Adding features during refactoring
- Perfectionism: Spending too long on diminishing returns
- No Monitoring: Not tracking impact of changes
- Ignoring Feedback: Not adapting based on results
- Solo Refactoring: Not involving team in major changes
Related Commands
/architecture-review: Assess current architecture
/code-review: Review refactored code
/system-design: Design target architecture
/technical-debt-audit: Identify areas needing refactoring