Ultra-Deep Analysis

Analyze the following task from multiple expert perspectives, then synthesize into a cohesive recommendation.

Task: $ARGUMENTS

---

Process

1. Restate the problem - Confirm understanding in 2-3 sentences
2. Analyze from four perspectives - Each perspective surfaces different concerns
3. Synthesize insights - Combine into a unified view
4. Deliver actionable output - Concrete recommendations or implementation

---

Output Format

1. Problem Restatement

Confirm understanding of the task. What are we solving? What constraints exist?

2. Perspective Analysis

Architect Perspective

• High-level approach and system design considerations
• Trade-offs, patterns, and architectural implications
• How this fits into the broader system

Research Perspective

• Relevant patterns, precedents, or industry knowledge
• How similar problems are solved elsewhere
• External resources or documentation to consider

Coder Perspective

• Implementation approach and technical details
• Code-level concerns, edge cases, error handling
• Specific files, functions, or modules involved

Tester Perspective

• Validation strategy and test scenarios
• What could go wrong, failure modes
• How to verify correctness and prevent regressions

3. Synthesis

Combine the four perspectives into a unified analysis:

• Where do perspectives align?
• Where do they conflict, and how to resolve?
• What's the recommended approach given all viewpoints?

4. Final Recommendation

Actionable output: steps, code, commands, or decisions.

5. Open Questions (if any)

Remaining uncertainties or items needing user input.

---

Guidelines

• Take time to think deeply from each perspective before synthesizing
• Perspectives should surface genuinely different concerns, not repeat the same points
• The synthesis should resolve tensions between perspectives, not just summarize them
• Final recommendation should be concrete and actionable