From architecture-review
Structured architecture review using ATAM-inspired quality attribute analysis
npx claudepluginhub crazymeal/claude-architect-marketplace --plugin architecture-reviewdocument-or-directoryopus# Architecture Review Rigorous architecture review using quality attribute scenarios and trade-off analysis. ## Review Framework (ATAM-Inspired) ### Phase 1: Understand the Architecture 1. **Business Context**: Goals, stakeholders, constraints 2. **Architectural Approach**: Style, key elements, interactions 3. **QA Requirements**: Priority "-ilities", SLAs, tensions ### Phase 2: Quality Attribute Analysis For each priority QA, develop scenario: Reference `shared/core-knowledge.md` for QA list. ### Phase 3: Trade-off Analysis | Decision | Positive Impact | Negative Impact | Sensitiv...
/review-architecturePerforms architecture review on specified scope or path, evaluating patterns, SOLID principles, scalability, security, technical debt, and API design.
/review-architectureReview code against Python Clean Architecture principles
/review-architectureDeep architecture review — evaluate system structure, boundaries, and evolution path
/review-architecture<!-- AUTO-GENERATED by export-plugins.py — DO NOT EDIT -->
/review-architectureArchitecture review covering design quality, performance, scalability, and API contracts in a single pass
/review-architectureCheck structural integrity, pattern consistency, and coupling in code changes.
Rigorous architecture review using quality attribute scenarios and trade-off analysis.
For each priority QA, develop scenario:
Quality Attribute: [e.g., Performance]
Scenario: [Stimulus] → [System] → [Response] under [Conditions]
Current Support: [How architecture addresses this]
Risks: [What could cause failure]
Sensitivity: [Decisions affecting this most]
Reference shared/core-knowledge.md for QA list.
| Decision | Positive Impact | Negative Impact | Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Decision] | [QA improved] | [QA harmed] | H/M/L |
Categorize:
Write to files:
| Artifact | Location |
|---|---|
| Review report | docs/reviews/review-[system]-[date].md |
| Action items | docs/reviews/actions/[priority]/ACTION-NNN-[title].md |
| Risk register | docs/reviews/risks-[system].md |
## Architecture Review: [System]
### Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences: assessment, key finding, recommendation]
**Verdict**: Approve | Approve with conditions | Revise
### Quality Attribute Analysis
#### [QA 1]
- **Requirement**: [target]
- **Scenario**: [stimulus → response]
- **Assessment**: Adequate / At Risk / Insufficient
- **Concerns**: [specific issues]
### Trade-off Analysis
[Table]
### Sensitivity Points
### Identified Risks
### Recommendations (prioritized)