From architecture-review
Review an Architecture Decision Record for completeness and quality
npx claudepluginhub crazymeal/claude-architect-marketplace --plugin architecture-review<adr-file>haiku# ADR Review Quick quality review of an Architecture Decision Record. ## Review Checklist ### Structure (MADR) - [ ] Status clearly stated - [ ] Date recorded - [ ] Decision makers identified - [ ] Context explains the problem ### Decision Quality - [ ] Decision drivers are concrete and measurable - [ ] Multiple options genuinely considered - [ ] Chosen option justified against drivers - [ ] Trade-offs explicitly acknowledged ### Consequences - [ ] Positive consequences linked to drivers - [ ] Negative consequences honestly stated - [ ] Risks identified ### Connections - [ ] Related A...
Quick quality review of an Architecture Decision Record.
| Issue | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Vague context | "We need a database" | State specific requirements |
| Fake options | Only one real option | Include genuinely considered alternatives |
| Missing drivers | No criteria for decision | List measurable requirements |
| Hidden trade-offs | Only benefits listed | Be honest about costs |
| Orphan ADR | No links | Connect to related decisions |
## ADR Review: [Title]
**Overall**: Pass / Pass with suggestions / Needs revision
### Strengths
- [What's done well]
### Issues
- **[Critical/Minor]**: [Issue and suggestion]
### Suggestions
- [Improvement ideas]