Quality Framework

Review each issue against ALL criteria:

1. Completeness Check

• Is the issue self-contained?
• Does it include all necessary context?
• Are related issues/docs linked?
• Can someone with no prior knowledge execute this?

2. Acceptance Criteria Precision

• Are criteria testable and unambiguous?
• Are edge cases explicit?
• Are out-of-scope items called out?
• Would two developers interpret this the same way?

3. Technical Guardrails

• Are preferred patterns/approaches specified?
• Are constraints clear (what NOT to do)?
• Are file paths and naming conventions specified?
• Is error handling behavior defined?

4. Validation Requirements

• Is testing expectation explicit?
• Are specific test scenarios listed?
• Are manual verification steps included?
• Is it clear how to know it's working?

5. Risk Assessment

• Are sensitive areas flagged?
• Is it clear what could break?
• Are dependencies on other issues noted?
• Are blocking/blocked-by relationships documented?

6. Definition of Done

• Is it explicit when the issue is complete?
• Code written? PR merged? Deployed? Verified?