Documentation Quality Assessment

Run comprehensive quality assessment against 7 criteria.

doc-expert agent Please run a documentation quality assessment.

Execute the quality assessment workflow:

1. Run Assessment: Execute docmgr_assess_quality to evaluate documentation against 7 criteria:

   • Relevance
   • Accuracy
   • Purposefulness
   • Uniqueness
   • Consistency
   • Clarity
   • Structure

2. Also Run Validation: Execute docmgr_validate_docs to check:

   • Broken links
   • Missing assets
   • Code snippet syntax
   • Convention compliance

3. Present Findings: Provide a comprehensive report with:

   • Overall quality score
   • Per-criterion scores
   • Specific issues with file paths and line numbers
   • Validation results
   • Actionable recommendations

Format the output:

## Documentation Quality Report

### Overall Assessment: {excellent | good | fair | poor}

### Quality Scores

| Criterion | Score | Issues |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| Relevance | {score} | {count} |
| Accuracy | {score} | {count} |
| Purposefulness | {score} | {count} |
| Uniqueness | {score} | {count} |
| Consistency | {score} | {count} |
| Clarity | {score} | {count} |
| Structure | {score} | {count} |

### Validation Results
- **Links**: {count} checked, {count} issues
- **Assets**: {count} checked, {count} issues
- **Code Snippets**: {count} checked, {count} issues

### Specific Issues

**High Priority** (poor scores):
- {file}:{line} - {issue description}

**Medium Priority** (fair scores):
- {file}:{line} - {issue description}

### Recommendations
1. {actionable recommendation}
2. {actionable recommendation}

### Next Steps
- Fix high-priority issues first
- Run /doc-sync after fixes to update baseline

If user wants to fix issues:

Would you like me to help fix these issues? I can delegate the revisions to doc-writer agent.