Get structured design feedback on usability, hierarchy, and consistency
Analyzes designs for usability, hierarchy, consistency, and accessibility issues with structured feedback.
/plugin marketplace add anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/plugin install design@knowledge-work-plugins<Figma URL, screenshot, or description>If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Get structured design feedback across multiple dimensions. See the design-critique skill for the evaluation framework and feedback principles.
/critique $ARGUMENTS
Review the design: @$1
If a Figma URL is provided, pull the design from Figma. If a file is referenced, read it. Otherwise, ask the user to describe or share their design.
## Design Critique: [Design Name]
### Overall Impression
[1-2 sentence first reaction — what works, what's the biggest opportunity]
### Usability
| Finding | Severity | Recommendation |
|---------|----------|----------------|
| [Issue] | 🔴 Critical / 🟡 Moderate / 🟢 Minor | [Fix] |
### Visual Hierarchy
- **What draws the eye first**: [Element] — [Is this correct?]
- **Reading flow**: [How does the eye move through the layout?]
- **Emphasis**: [Are the right things emphasized?]
### Consistency
| Element | Issue | Recommendation |
|---------|-------|----------------|
| [Typography/spacing/color] | [Inconsistency] | [Fix] |
### Accessibility
- **Color contrast**: [Pass/fail for key text]
- **Touch targets**: [Adequate size?]
- **Text readability**: [Font size, line height]
### What Works Well
- [Positive observation 1]
- [Positive observation 2]
### Priority Recommendations
1. **[Most impactful change]** — [Why and how]
2. **[Second priority]** — [Why and how]
3. **[Third priority]** — [Why and how]
If ~~design tool is connected:
If ~~user feedback is connected:
/critiqueEvaluate design effectiveness from a UX perspective. Assesses visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, and overall design quality with actionable feedback.