Creates comprehensive feature comparison matrices across technologies to enable objective evaluation.
Creates comprehensive feature comparison matrices across technologies to enable objective evaluation.
/plugin marketplace add avovello/cc-plugins/plugin install research@cc-pluginsCreates comprehensive feature comparison matrices across technologies to enable objective evaluation.
✅ DOES:
❌ DOES NOT:
Categories:
## Feature Comparison: State Management Libraries
| Feature | Redux | Zustand | MobX |
|---------|-------|---------|------|
| **Core Features** |
| Centralized Store | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Multiple Stores | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Immutable Updates | ✅ Required | ⚠️ Optional | ❌ Mutable |
| Time Travel Debugging | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No |
| Computed Values | ⚠️ Via selectors | ⚠️ Manual | ✅ Auto (computed) |
| Async Actions | ⚠️ Via middleware | ✅ Built-in | ✅ Built-in |
| **Developer Experience** |
| Learning Curve | 🔴 Steep | 🟢 Gentle | 🟡 Moderate |
| Boilerplate | 🔴 High | 🟢 Low | 🟡 Moderate |
| Bundle Size | 🟡 18.5 KB | 🟢 1.1 KB | 🟡 16 KB |
| TypeScript | ✅ Excellent | ✅ Excellent | ✅ Good |
| **Tooling** |
| DevTools | ✅ Redux DevTools | ⚠️ Limited | ✅ MobX DevTools |
| Hot Reloading | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Code Generation | ✅ RTK Templates | ❌ No | ❌ No |
Legend:
## Detailed Comparison
### State Updates
**Redux**:
- Immutable updates required
- Pure functions (reducers)
- Predictable state changes
- More code, but very clear
**Zustand**:
- Can be mutable or immutable
- Direct state updates
- Flexible approach
- Less boilerplate
**MobX**:
- Mutable updates
- Observable pattern
- Automatic reactivity
- Feels more OOP-like
### Async Handling
**Redux**:
- Requires middleware (redux-thunk, redux-saga)
- More setup needed
- Very powerful with sagas
- Steep learning curve
**Zustand**:
- Async in actions directly
- No middleware needed
- Simple and straightforward
- Less powerful but easier
**MobX**:
- Async actions built-in
- Runin Action for multiple updates
- Natural async/await usage
- Straightforward
### TypeScript Support
**Redux**: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Excellent type inference with RTK
- Type-safe reducers and actions
- Great IDE support
**Zustand**: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Excellent type inference
- Minimal type annotations needed
- Very TypeScript-friendly
**MobX**: ⭐⭐⭐⭐
- Good TypeScript support
- Decorators require configuration
- Some type annotations needed
# Feature Comparison Report
## Technologies Compared
- Redux (v5.0.1)
- Zustand (v4.5.0)
- MobX (v6.12.0)
## Feature Matrix
[Comprehensive table as shown above]
## Key Differences
### Redux
**Strengths**:
- ✅ Time-travel debugging
- ✅ Predictable state management
- ✅ Large ecosystem
- ✅ Excellent tooling
**Weaknesses**:
- ❌ High boilerplate
- ❌ Steep learning curve
- ❌ Larger bundle size
### Zustand
**Strengths**:
- ✅ Minimal boilerplate
- ✅ Tiny bundle size (1.1 KB)
- ✅ Easy to learn
- ✅ Flexible approach
**Weaknesses**:
- ❌ No time-travel debugging
- ❌ Smaller ecosystem
- ❌ Limited tooling
### MobX
**Strengths**:
- ✅ Automatic reactivity
- ✅ Natural mutable updates
- ✅ Less boilerplate
- ✅ Good for OOP developers
**Weaknesses**:
- ❌ Less predictable
- ❌ Can be "magic" (implicit)
- ❌ Learning observable patterns
## Feature Coverage
| Category | Redux | Zustand | MobX | Winner |
|----------|-------|---------|------|--------|
| Core Features | 90% | 75% | 85% | Redux |
| DX | 70% | 95% | 80% | Zustand |
| TypeScript | 95% | 95% | 80% | Redux/Zustand |
| Tooling | 95% | 60% | 85% | Redux |
| Performance | 85% | 90% | 90% | Zustand/MobX |
| **Overall** | **87%** | **83%** | **84%** | **Redux** |
## Unique Features
### Redux Only
- Time-travel debugging
- Redux DevTools with full history
- Extensive middleware ecosystem
### Zustand Only
- Minimal API surface
- Smallest bundle size
- No provider needed
### MobX Only
- Automatic computed values
- True reactive programming
- Mutable state updates
Use this agent when analyzing conversation transcripts to find behaviors worth preventing with hooks. Examples: <example>Context: User is running /hookify command without arguments user: "/hookify" assistant: "I'll analyze the conversation to find behaviors you want to prevent" <commentary>The /hookify command without arguments triggers conversation analysis to find unwanted behaviors.</commentary></example><example>Context: User wants to create hooks from recent frustrations user: "Can you look back at this conversation and help me create hooks for the mistakes you made?" assistant: "I'll use the conversation-analyzer agent to identify the issues and suggest hooks." <commentary>User explicitly asks to analyze conversation for mistakes that should be prevented.</commentary></example>