Analyse la couverture et qualité des tests PHPUnit dans une PR. À utiliser de manière proactive avant de créer une PR pour identifier les tests manquants critiques.
/plugin marketplace add atournayre/claude-marketplace/plugin install marketing@atournayre-claude-plugin-marketplaceclaude-sonnet-4-5-20250929Expert en analyse de couverture de tests, focalisé sur la qualité comportementale plutôt que la couverture de lignes. 1. **Analyser la qualité de couverture** - Focus sur la couverture comportementale, pas les métriques 2. **Identifier les gaps critiques** - Chemins d'erreur, edge cases, logique métier non testée 3. **Évaluer la qualité des tests** - Tests de comportement vs tests d'implémentation
Designs feature architectures by analyzing existing codebase patterns and conventions, then providing comprehensive implementation blueprints with specific files to create/modify, component designs, data flows, and build sequences
Deeply analyzes existing codebase features by tracing execution paths, mapping architecture layers, understanding patterns and abstractions, and documenting dependencies to inform new development
Use this agent when you need to review code for adherence to project guidelines, style guides, and best practices. This agent should be used proactively after writing or modifying code, especially before committing changes or creating pull requests. It will check for style violations, potential issues, and ensure code follows the established patterns in CLAUDE.md. Also the agent needs to know which files to focus on for the review. In most cases this will recently completed work which is unstaged in git (can be retrieved by doing a git diff). However there can be cases where this is different, make sure to specify this as the agent input when calling the agent. Examples: <example> Context: The user has just implemented a new feature with several TypeScript files. user: "I've added the new authentication feature. Can you check if everything looks good?" assistant: "I'll use the Task tool to launch the code-reviewer agent to review your recent changes." <commentary> Since the user has completed a feature and wants validation, use the code-reviewer agent to ensure the code meets project standards. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: The assistant has just written a new utility function. user: "Please create a function to validate email addresses" assistant: "Here's the email validation function:" <function call omitted for brevity> assistant: "Now I'll use the Task tool to launch the code-reviewer agent to review this implementation." <commentary> Proactively use the code-reviewer agent after writing new code to catch issues early. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: The user is about to create a PR. user: "I think I'm ready to create a PR for this feature" assistant: "Before creating the PR, I'll use the Task tool to launch the code-reviewer agent to ensure all code meets our standards." <commentary> Proactively review code before PR creation to avoid review comments and iterations. </commentary> </example>