{"name":"mcorbett51090-ux-research-plugins-ux-research","owner":{"name":"ClaudePluginHub"},"plugins":[{"name":"mcorbett51090-ux-research-plugins-ux-research","source":{"source":"git-subdir","url":"https://github.com/mcorbett51090/ravenclaude","path":"plugins/ux-research"},"description":"UX-research team — 2 agents (ux-research-lead, research-execution-and-synthesis-specialist) that turn a fuzzy ask into a researchable question, pick a rigorous method (generative vs evaluative, qual vs quant, moderated vs unmoderated), run the study (usability tests, interviews, surveys), and synthesize evidence into decision-ready, bias-checked insight — without the research theater. The lead owns framing, method selection, the research plan, research-ops (recruiting, repository), and research ethics + participant-PII discipline (consent, anonymization). The specialist owns protocol & task design, non-leading moderation, survey design, and synthesis (affinity/thematic analysis, evidence strength, observation vs interpretation). 3 skills, a 2-doc knowledge bank + 2 templates. Distinct from product-management (roadmap/prioritization), web-design (visual/interaction/IA design), experimentation-growth-engineering (online A/B stats), data-science-research (advanced quant). Requires ravenclaude-core@>=0.7.0.","version":"0.1.0","strict":true,"keywords":["ux-research","user-research","usability-testing","user-interviews","survey-design","research-methods","research-synthesis","research-ops","research-ethics","participant-pii","affinity-mapping","research-bias"],"category":"testing"}]}